DR. NAIK'S FAQ ON HINDUISM
Gmail agrasen
[aryayouthgroup] Dr Naik’s “FAQ on Hinduism”
Agniveer Agni
Reply-To: aryayouthgroup@yahoogroups.com
To: Aryasamajonline Online
In the concluding part of Dr Naik’s research on Hinduism, the self-proclaimed expert on religions provides an FAQ – Frequently Asked Questions on Hinduism. Its a relatively longer article and bulk of it is devoted to either represent the debates between various schools of thought in Hinduism for his own Islamic end, or to narrate wisdom of Quran.
Instead of analyzing the entire article, I shall provide review of selected portions. To test if the rice is cooked or not, we just take a few grains out of cooker and test. This is an established way of rejecting fraud as per Darshan Shastras.You can review the entire article athttp://www.irf.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=200&Itemid=134 and laugh to your heart’s content.
I shall, as usual provide quotes from Dr Naik’s article and follow with comments in bold italics.
Dr Naik:
“When I was discussing with a Swami in IRF. He said that when our child asks us, “Why does the sky thunder?”, we reply that “aaee ma chakki pees rahi hai”, the grandmother is grinding flour in the heaven; because he is too young to understand. Similarly in the initial stages people require an idol for concentration.
In Islam we don’t believe in telling a lie, even if it’s a white lie. I will never give such a wrong answer to my child because later on when he goes to school and learns that the thundering sound after lightning is due to the expansion of rapidly heated air, he will either think that the teacher is lying or later on when he understands the fact he will conclude that the father is a liar. If you feel that the child may not understand certain difficult things you should simplify the answer rather than give a wrong fictitious reply. If you, yourself do not know the answer, you should have the guts to be truthful and say ‘I don’t know’. But many children nowadays will not be satisfied with this answer. If this answer was given to my son, he would say “Abba (father), why don’t you know?’ This will compel you to do your homework and thus educate yourself as well as your child.”
(1. While I agree that children should not be misled, this is a disease that came only after advent of foreigners. Before that most people used to be in gurukuls and used to learn sciences systematically.
2. But if in Islam, they do not believe in telling a white lie or giving wrong answer, Dr Naik should either re-read the very books he wants to establish as final version of God’s message, or admit that he himself has committed a sin by lying in this article, or admit that Allah himself lies. I shall now provide excerpts from Islamic texts on how they explain various phenomena.
A. What is plague?
Bukhari Volume 8, Book 77, Number 616:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
I asked Allah’s Apostle about the plague. He said, “That was a means of torture which Allah used to send upon whom-so-ever He wished, but He made it a source of mercy for the believers, for anyone who is residing in a town in which this disease is present, and remains there and does not leave that town, but has patience and hopes for Allah’s reward, and knows that nothing will befall him except what Allah has written for him, then he will get such reward as that of a martyr.”
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 71, Number 628:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “(Death from) plague is martyrdom for every Muslim.”
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 71, Number 629:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “He (a Muslim) who dies of an abdominal disease is a a martyr, and he who dies of plague is a martyr.”
THUS PLAGUE IS A TORTURE THAT MAKES YOU MARTYR!
B. How to treat one from flies?
Pharmacies can sell the fly wings which has cure.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 71, Number 673:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “If a fly falls in the vessel of any of you, let him dip all of it (into the vessel) and then throw it away, for in one of its wings there is a disease and in the other there is healing (antidote for it) i e. the treatment for that disease.”
C. Fate written in womb already!
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 6, Number 315:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
The Prophet said, “At every womb Allah appoints an angel who says, ‘O Lord! A drop of semen, O Lord! A clot. O Lord! A little lump of flesh.” Then if Allah wishes (to complete) its creation, the angel asks, (O Lord!) Will it be a male or female, a wretched or a blessed, and how much will his provision be? And what will his age be?’ So all that is written while the child is still in the mother’s womb.”
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 430:
Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Mus’ud:
Allah’s Apostle, said, ” a human being is put together in the womb of the mother in forty days, and then he becomes a clot of thick blood for a similar period, and then a piece of flesh for a similar period. Then Allah sends an angel who is ordered to write four things. He is ordered to write down his (i.e. the new creature’s) deeds, his livelihood, his (date of) death, and whether he will be blessed or wretched (in religion). Then the soul is breathed into him..”
D. Snake and Pregnancy
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 527:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
The Prophet said, “Kill the snake with two white lines on its back, for it blinds the on-looker and causes abortion.”
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 528:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
The Prophet ordered that a short-tailed or mutilated-tailed snake (i.e. Abtar) should be killed, for it blinds the on-looker and causes abortion.”
Volume 4, Book 54, Number 529:
Narrated Abu Mulaika:
Prophet said, ‘Do not kill snakes except the short-tailed or mutilated-tailed snake with two white lines on its back, for it causes abortion and makes one blind. So kill it.’
E. How to know looks of baby?
Bukhari:V4B55N546
“Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Gabriel has just now told me of the answer. If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble him, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her.’”
F. Why Babies cry?
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 506:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “When any human being is born. Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.”
G. Spit is hygeinic
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 188:
Narrated Ibn Shihab:
Mahmud bin Ar-Rabi’ who was the person on whose face the Prophet had ejected a mouthful of water from his family’s well while he was a boy, and ‘Urwa (on the authority of Al-Miswar and others) who testified each other, said, “Whenever the Prophet , performed ablution, his companions were nearly fighting for the remains of the water.”
You can review some more superstitions of islamic science by clicking this sentence.
The limited point to made by these examples is that Islam of Dr Naik is not as truthful or scientific as he would want us to believe. And as far as truth is concerned, Truth is considered the foremost virtue in Hinduism – be it any sect or school of thought. Hindus also do not have the concept of Taqiah as in Islam, which permits one to spread false in certain situations like destroying an enemy.)
Dr Naik:
“Hinduism is not the oldest of all the religions. It is Islam which is the first and the oldest of all religions. People have a misconception that Islam is 1400 years old and that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is the founder of this religion. Islam existed since time immemorial, ever since man first set foot on this earth. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was not the founder of Islam. He was the last and final Messenger of Almighty God.”
(Any proofs for this? Do we have any literature of Islam prior to Quran? Is there anything before ths Vedas? Are there proofs to conclude that Muhammad was a messenger in first place, forget the case of his being last? Except what Muhammad is alleged to say in a Quran that even many Muslims refuse to accept as authentic, and was written 20 years after Muhammad’s death by his followers who were killing each other to prove Islam to be a religion of Peace!)
Dr Naik:
“For any religion to be pure and authentic, its scriptures should not contain any interpolation, addition, deletion or revision. Moreover the religion’s source of inspiration and direction should be Almighty God. The Qur’an is the only religious scripture on the face of the earth which has been maintained it its original form. All the other religious scriptures, of all the other religions have interpolations, additions, deletions or revisions. The Qur’an has been in the memory of a multitude of people, intact in its original form ever since its revelation, and now there are hundreds of thousands of people who have preserved it in their memory. Moreover, if you compare the copies made by Caliph Uthman from the original Qur’an which is yet present in the museum in Tashkent and in Koptaki museum in Turkey, they are the same as the ones we possess today.”
(1. I agree with the first two sentences. But rest is hoax. No text apart from Vedas can claim freedom from any scope of interpolations. This is not merely based on memory of people who mugged it, but also by a mechanism of 10 different ways of reciting it, which exactly match even today. The gurukuls teaching these Paatha vidhis are thriving till today. Even the Christian indologists who studied Vedas thoroughly, could not cite one single evidence to claim any kind of interpolation in Vedas. For more on this, please read Unchangeable Vedas.
2. No all sects of Islam believe Quran to be authentic. Many have even written their own Qurans. Some believe that original Quran was mutilated. Others believe that some verses in Quran are written by Satan who came in Muhammad once and narrated a few Ayats.
3. When was the original Quran made? Much after death of Muhammad. Further Quran did not reveal in one go. It was revealed throughout the life of Muhammad. And for first fifteen years, Muhammad had no resources to even write the Quran. Even the Ayat 2.106 of Quran itself admits that not everything can be remembered. Even the Arabic script was not developed that time and no Quran of Muhammad’s time exists.
4. Quran is supposed to be written by Muhammad’s followers after his death. Now these followers were killing each other for power, and included his beloved wife Aisha, whom he had married when she was 6 years old, and in whose company most Ayats were revealed. Many Muslims refuse to respect Aisha as an authentic person. How can one consider such people to have had capability to transmit Allah’s message of Peace without distortions?
5. Read this article for more details on this: Authenticity of Quran)
Dr Naik:
“A religion is best, if it has the solutions to the problems of mankind
For a religion to be considered the best, it should have the solution to all the problems of mankind. It should be the religion of truth, and should be applicable to all ages. Islam is the only religion which has the solution to all the problems of mankind. e.g. the problem of alcoholism, surplus women, rape and molestation, robbery, racism, casteism, etc.
Islam is the religion of truth, and its laws and solutions are applicable to all the ages. The Qur’an is the only religious book on the face of the earth, which has maintained its purity and authenticity proving itself to be the word of God in all the ages. i.e. previously, when it was the age of miracles, literature and poetry and in present times when it is the age of science and technology. Moreover, Islam is not a man-made religion, but a religion revealed and inspired by Almighty God. It is the only religion acceptable in His Sight.”
(1. I thought this was a FAQ on Hinduism. Anyways, before making such far-fetched claims, Dr Naik should decide which of the 73 sects of Islam is actually true Islam. Because rest will go to Hell as per Islamic hadiths. Refer 73 Sects of Islam and One True Jamaat
2. Also he should explain why Islam was revealed in a language which was neither the most popular language of world when Quran came, nor is it so today, nor it has been ever. In fact when Quran was revealed, even the script was not yet standardized and Muhammad had no resources to even document the Quran. The claim of authenticity is already debunked. Also why is it that any reference to the faith of more than 50% of population of world – Eastern philosophies not even referred to?
3. Can he cite one single country that follows version of Islam that Dr Naik wants us to believe as true islam, and then assess whether indeed Islam has solutions or not? Because all Islamic countries have an adverse gender ratio, non-tolerance for other faiths, issues of human rights etc. Science of islam has already been explored to some extent.
4. How does Dr Naik know that Islam is the only religion acceptable to God? If that be so, why could not God give Quran in a less confusing and more systematic manner than giving it to someone in bits and pieces throughout his poverty and then war-torn life, where it could not be even documented? And does not completely debar evils like marriage in close-family, marriage with small babies, slavery, polygamy etc which are proven to be disastrous from social and medical standpoint? Also the language was among least popular of world, and also not original language of world. I can well understand Quran to be a step towards progress of barbaric Arabic society. But can Dr Naik provide evidences to prove it final version of Allah’s message for all ages to come? (When even many sects of Islam refuse to believe so!)
)
Dr Naik: “The land used for burying a dead body can be reutilised for burying another body after a few years since the human body gets decomposed and mixed in the soil.”
(If that be so, why do Muslims create a permanent structure around the burial? Why do they constuct Kabras, Makbaras and memorials on places of death that remain unused for ages to come? The fact is that practice of burial permanently wastes land space. The practice of cremation ensures that neither does decaying body spread disease nor it occupies further place.)
Dr Naik: “Wearing a bindi or mangalsutra is a sign of Hindu women. The Islamic dress code does not permit a Muslim to wear any sign, symbol or mark which is specially significant of a non-Muslim.”
(Bindi or Mangalsutra is not a necessary sign for all Hindu women. It is of much recent origin and is not mentioned in ancient texts of rituals. It became famous as an aesthetic concept later. In fact it became more popular because of Islamic invasions. The evils of Purdah system and Sati also started from times when Muslim invaders would kill men and rape women. Even today, plight of Hindus in Bangladesh is well known. Thus Bindi and Mangalsutra became signs of married women to at least spare them from torment of invaders.
As far as Islamic dress code is concerned, that has been medically proven to cause Vitamin D deficiency in women of Muslim countries due to emphasis on covering all parts of body and staying indoors. Please refer to one of the several such medical research reports by clicking here.)
Dr Naik:
“Islamic Criminal Law is Most Practical
The Muslims in India alone cannot separately follow the Islamic Criminal Law without involving the Non-Muslims………..
Islam besides pointing out a crime, it also gives you a solution showing how to prevent the crime e.g. chopping the hands of a robber, death penalty for the rapist. The punishment is so severe that it is a deterrent for the criminal to commit the crime. He will think a hundred times before committing a crime.
Thus if crime has to be reduced or stopped in India the best solution is to implement ‘The Common Islamic Criminal Law’.”
(1. Any student of Law and Social studies would know how practical are the Islamic laws, especially those relating to slavery and women rights.
2. Dr Naik has deliberately chosen to highlight those aspects of Islamic law which may not cause that much dispute. Let him answer why even most Muslim countries refuse to implement Islamic Criminal law?
3. Would Dr Naik agree to have Islamic Criminal Law implemented when both the parties involved are Muslims? Forget about actual implementation, would he himself and IRF agree to punish themselves as per Islamic Criminal Law by their own choice? If that be so, a large number of lies stated by them have been exposed. Would they agree to punish themselves by chopping their hands off or other punishments for telling lies to public at large?
4. Islamic Law has been stated to be most practical. Could Dr Naik suggest what is so practical about stating that (evidence of two women = evidence of one man)?
5. Could he suggest what makes it so practical for a divorced couple to reunite without the wife having intercourse with another person and then taking Talaq from him?
6. Could he also enlighten what makes Islamic Law so practical that a rape victim will have to provide one male or two female eye-witnesses who have seen the act of organs by their own eyes. It sounds disgusting, but that is what Islamic Criminal Law states. Circumstantial evidences and testing do not count in case of rape!
7. Could he also guide why it is practical for a father to marry her baby-girl as per his wishes and it is legal to have relations if girl is above 9 years?
Visit http://www.homa.org/ on more on Islamic Criminal Law and Women. )
Dr Naik:
“Which prophet was sent to India?
Regarding the question of which prophet of God was sent to India, and can we consider Ram or Krishna to be prophets of God, there is no text in the Qur’an or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the prophet that was sent to India. Since the names of Ram and Krishna are nowhere to be found in the Qur’an and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure whether they were prophets of God or not. Some Muslims, especially certain Muslim politicians who try to appease the Hindus, say Ram Alai-his-salaam, i.e. Ram, may peace be on him. This is totally wrong, since there is no authentic proof from the Qur’an and Sahih Hadith that he was a prophet of God. However, a person may say that perhaps they may have been the prophets of God.
Even if Ram and Krishna were prophets, today we have to follow the last Prophet of God i.e. Muhammad (pbuh)
Even if Ram and Krishna were prophets of God, they were only meant for people of that time and were to be followed only for that particular period of time. Today, all the human beings throughout the world, including India should only follow the last and final prophet and Messenger of God – prophet Muhammad (pbuh).”
(1. No text in Quran mentions Ram and Krishna because Muhammad was too ignorant of the traditions of the East in same way as Europe was ignorant of America before Columbus. Or else how could Allah have forgotten to mention about beliefs of more than 50% of world population then?
2. This is religious fundamentalism at peak. Only Prophet Muhammad is final Prophet and if you do not believe so you will burn in Hell forever! And if you believe, you will get 72 virgins and lot of fun in Paradise forever! But as I proved earlier, out of 73 sects of Islam, only one will reach Paradise, and rest will in any case burn in Hell, not to talk of non-Muslims. It seems that Allah has already decided that 99% of people would be in Hell. So let those loving humanity share the troubles of their fellow humans in Hell than enjoy the luxuries of Paradise alone!
3. As proven earlier, neither can Quran claim authenticity, nor can there be any way to assert that Muhammad and Quran are to be taken so seriously as Dr Naik would want us to take.
4. On contrary, Vedas do not force anyone to believe in Vedas or anything. One is given the liberty to explore, discover and only then accept anything. Blind faith and fear of Hell and lure of Heaven are not tactics employed to attract followership. Also one need not believe in any agent of God to achieve bliss.)
Dr Naik:
“The question that arises is “which revelation of God was sent to India and whether we can consider the Vedas and the other Hindu Scriptures to be the revelations of God?” There is no text in the Qur’an or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the revelation that was sent to India. Since the names of the Vedas or other Hindu scriptures are no where to be found in Qur’an and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure that they were the revelations of God. They may be the revelation of God or may not be the revelation of God.
Even if the Veda was the word of God today you have to follow the Qur’an
Even if the Vedas and the other scriptures were the revelations from God, they were only meant for people of that time and were to be followed only for that particular period of time. Today all human beings through out the world including India should only follow the last and final Revelation of God, i.e. the Qur’an. Moreover since all the previous revelations were not meant to be followed for eternity, Almighty God did not preserve them in their original form. There is not a single religious scripture of any of the major religions which claims to be the word of God and has maintained its pure original text and is free from alteration, adulteration and interpolation. Since the Glorious Qur’an is to be followed for eternity, Allah (swt) has taken upon Himself to maintain its original purity and guard it from corruption. Allah says in Glorious Qur’an.”
(1. Here his hypocrisy is finally caught. And Dr Naik should either chop his hands or get himself lashed after consulting Islamic Criminal Law. He is suddenly in doubt whether Vedas are revelations or not. But larger part of his entire thesis rests on proving that Vedas prophesise Prophet Muhammad. If Vedas give revelations about Prophet Muhammad, population of Mecca, companions of Muhammad, and even number of leaders he fought against, what remains to have doubt on Vedas being revelations and being Prophetic by prophesising Prophet Muhammad?
2. If we accept Dr Naik blindly so far, we should agree that Vedas contain such detailed Prophecies about Muhammad that even Quran does not have! Thus obviously Vedas are more prophetic and revelation than Quran. Can Dr Naik provide a similar detailed prophecy from Quran? As per his previous logic, role of Vedas ended with Quran. So vedas predicted Quran and Muhammad. Why could Quran predict nothing of that sort?
3. Obviously two points emerge – one, that Vedas have been proved by Dr Naik to be more prophetic and revelations than Quran. And hence Vedas must be followed and not Quran. Two, since Dr Naik has committed a crime by showing hypocrisy in his own statements by doubting the very Vedas whom he himself proved to be prophetic, he should have his hands chopped off or hae himself lashed or whatever as per Islamic Criminal Law. This would ensure Paradise for him, because Allah is merciful!
4. And if he does not get himself punished as per Islamic Criminal Law, he is a Kafir who has ensured Hell for himself more than anyone else. In that case, he is not to be taken seriously. Quran says that one should not believe in words of hypcrites and Kafirs who are there to deceive and fool you.)
Dr Naik:
“Allah” in Rigveda Book 2 Hymn I verse II
Even in the Rigveda which is the most sacred scripture of the Hindus, one of the attributes given to God Almighty in Book no 2 Hymn no I verse II, is ‘Ila’ which if pronounced properly is the same as Allah.
Allo Upanishad:
Amongst the various Upanishads one of the Upanishad is named as ‘Allo’ Upanishad in which God is referred to as “Allah” several times.”
(1.One does admit that Muhammad did not discover a new language (He was illiterate by the way). So he used words of the prevalent language. And Arabic definitely is derived from Vedic Sanskrit which is the mother of all languages. So Allah can derive from ‘Allah”. We are happy to see Dr Naik finally accepting his Vedic roots. So he should come back to the basics and start using ‘Ila’ to worship ‘Allah’. Further he should also come back to roots of ‘Naik’ which is ‘Naayak’ of Sanskrit and accept the Vedic language and worship in totality. We would be glad to teach him and help him forget his hypocritical ways.
2. Allo Upanishad is a well-known fraud Upanishad. One hundred years ago Muslims used to call it a part of Vedas. But now after Vedas became easily available, they now call it a separate Upanishad! This entertaining book contains mix of Arabic and Sanskrit and seems to be concocted during our long Muslim rule. The grammar is completely out of place and no one can trace this upanishad to any original root – either in Vedas or Brahmans or any branch of Vedas.)
A more critical analysis of Quran and such spurious claims are found here: Chapter 14
Having concluded this commentary on Dr Zakir Naik’s research into Hinduism, we come to following conclusions:
a. If Muhammad is in Hindu Scriptures, he was a ghost, demon and mass-murderer
b. Dr Zakir Naik and IRF is proven to have committed hypocrisy and falsehood, and hence should punish themselves as per Islamic Criminal Law (cutting off-hands, lashing or whatever)
c. The authenticity of Quran is questionable. Its is also not as prophetic as Vedas. So Dr Naik and IRF should embrace the Vedas and change their and Allah’s name as per vedic traditions.
d. In any case, challenge to Dr Naik is still open.
e. The basis of Dr Naik’s logic is Poison=Death=Rest=Peace=Islam, hence Poison = Islam
Al truth-seekers are appealed to reject the path of falsehood and embrace truth and truth alone. Or have their hands chopped off as per Islamic law.
Gmail Delicious Facebook Digg Twitter Share/Bookmark
Related posts:
1. Dr Naik’s “Concept of God in Hinduism”
2. Dr Naik’s Introduction to Hinduism (edited with comments)
3. Prophet in Hindu Scriptures – An analysis (Part 1)
Read more…
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
* New Members 5
* New Files 1
Visit Your Group Start a New Topic
website-www.aryayuvakparishad.com
For yuva udgosh newsletter send your address,phone-no & email address
Please Share Your Thoughts,Activities,Social welfair activities,Vedic Sidhants, National Integration & your valueable views on Arya Youth group or email at aryayouthgroup@yahoogroups.com or aryayouth@gmail.com
The Arya Youth Group is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the Arya Yuvak Parishad views or opinions. Please note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the sender have been verified.
The opinion express in the group is of the author & not neccessary reflect the opinion of group owner.
contact Anil Arya(National President)-09810117464,09868051444
Mahender Bhai(National Secretary)-01120012237,9868246754
D.K. Bhagat(Press Co-ordinator)09312406810,1120298026,
Shanker Dev(AryaSamaj Kabir Basti Office Manager)-09868002130
Office time-12am to 7.00 pm weekly off-Thursday
MARKETPLACE
Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living
Mom Power: Discover the community of moms doing more for their families, for the world and for each other
Yahoo! Groups
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___
posted by SHER SINGH AGRAWAL @ 12:53 PM
6 comments
