WRITTEN BY A PAKISTANI JOURNALIST ABOUT INDIA
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written by a Pakistani journalist about India...Capital suggestion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Krishnaswamy Narasimhan Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:34 AM
To: Krishnaswamy Narasimhan
Dear Insafcan,
When some foreigner writes good about India, we get excited. But this one is different.
krishnaswamy.
Written by a Pakistani journalist about India ... Capital suggestion ... By Dr Farrukh Saleem
Here's what is happening in India :
The two Ambani brothers can buy 100 percent of every company listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) and would still be left with $30 billion to spare. The four richest Indians can buy up all goods and services produced over a year by 169 million Pakistanis and still be left with $60 billion to spare. The four richest Indians are now richer than the forty richest Chinese.
In November, Bombay Stock Exchange's benchmark Sensex flirted with 20,000 points. As a consequence, Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries became a $100 bill ion company (the entire KSE is capitalized at $65 billion). Mukesh owns 48 percent of Reliance.
In November, comes Neeta's birthday. Neeta turned forty-four three weeks ago. Look what she got from her husband as her birthday gift:
A sixty-million dollar jet with a custom fitted master bedroom, bathroom with mood lighting, a sky bar, entertainment cabins, satellite television, wireless communication and a separate cabin with game consoles. Neeta is Mukesh Ambani's wife, and Mukesh is not India 's richest but the second richest..
Mukesh is now building his new home, Residence Antillia (after a mythical, phantom island somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean ). At a cost of $1 billion this would be the most expensive home on the face of the planet. At 173 meters tall Mukesh's new family residence, for a family of six, will be the equivalent of a 60-storeyed building. The first six floors are reserved for parking. The seventh floor is for car servicing and maintenance.. The eighth floor houses a mini-theatre. Then there's a health club, a gym and a swimming pool. Two floors are reserved for Ambani family's guests. Four floors above the guest floors are family floors all with a superb view of the Arabian Sea On top of everything are three helipads. A staff of 600 is expected to care for the family and their family home.
In 2004, India became the 3rd most attractive foreign direct investment destination. Pakistan wasn't even in the top 25 countries.
In 2004, the United Nations, the representative body of 192 sovereign member states, had requested the Election Commission of India to assist the UN in the holding elections in Al Jumhuriyah al Iraqiyah and Dowlat-e Eslami-ye Afghanestan. Why the Election Commission of India and not the Election Commission of Pakistan? After all, Islamabad is closer to Kabul than is Delhi .
Imagine, 12 percent of all American scientists are of Indian origin; 38 percent of doctors in America are Indian; 36 percent of NASA scientists are Indians; 34 percent of Microsoft employees are Indians; and 28 percent of IBM employees are Indians.
For the record: Sabeer Bhatia created and founded Hotmail. Sun Microsystems was founded by Vinod Khosla. The Intel Pentium processor, that runs 90 percent of all computers, was fathered by Vinod Dham.
Rajiv Gupta co-invented Hewlett Packard's E-speak project. Four out often Silicon Valley start-ups are run by Indians. Bollywood produces 800 movies per year and six Indian ladies have won Miss Universe/Miss World titles over the past 10 years.
For the record: Azim Premji, the richest Muslim entrepreneur on the face of the planet, was born in Bombay and now lives in Bangalore.India now has more than three dozen billionaires; Pakistan has none (not a single dollar billionaire).
The other amazing aspect is the rapid pace at which India is creating wealth. In 2002, Dhirubhai Ambani, Mukesh and Anil Ambani's father, left his two sons a fortune worth $2.8 billion. In 2007, their combined wealth stood at $94 billion. On 29 October 2007, as a result of the stock market rally and the appreciation of the Indian rupee, Mukesh became the richest person in the world, with net worth climbing to US$63.2 billion (Bill Gates, the richest American, stands at around $56 billion). Indians and Pakistanis have the same Y-chromosome haplogroup. We have the same genetic sequence and the same genetic marker (namely: M124).
We have the same DNA molecule, the same DNA sequence. Our culture, our traditions and our cuisine are all the same. We watch the same movies and sing the same songs. What is it that Indians have and we don't?
INDIANS ELECT THEIR LEADERS !!!!!! ... And also to mention:
They think of Construction of own nation, unlike other nations who are just concerned with destruction of others ...
Simple answer to why the Indians fare better than the Pakistanis -
They don't focus on religion all the time & neither do they spend time & money in devising ways to kill their own & everyone else over religion.
"HAPPY REPUBLIC DAY"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.
DRUG RECALL - COMMON COLD, etc.
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fw: Drug Recall--Very Serious
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bharat J. Gajjar Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:11 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: navinmazatlan@hotmail.com
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:09 PM
Subject: Fw: Drug Recall--Very Serious
2-6-10
DRUG RECALL - ESPECIALLY SOME COMMON COLD MEDICINES.
Navin
CONFIRMED BY: SNOPES.COM & FDA Jan 5, 2010
Drug Recall - Very Serious *** Send to friends & family
Several drugs containing PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE are being recalled.
STOP TAKING anything containing this ingredient. It has been linked to increased hemorrhagic stroke (bleeding in brain)
among women ages 18-49 in the three days after starting use of medication The FDA recommended that everyone (even children) seek alternative medicine.
The following medications contain Phenylpropanolamine:
Acutrim Diet Gum Appetite Suppressant
Acutrim Plus Dietary Supplements
Acutrim Maximum Strength Appetite Control
Alka-Seltzer Plus Children's Cold Medicine Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold medicine (cherry or orange)
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold Medicine Original
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Cough Medicine Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Flu Medicine
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Sinus Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Night-Time Cold Medicine
BC Allergy Sinus Cold Powder
BC Sinus Cold Powder
Comtrex Flu Therapy & Fever Relief
Day & Night Contac 12-Hour Cold Capsules
Contac 12 Hour Caplets
Coricidin D Cold, Flu & Sinus
Dexatrim Caffeine Free
Dexatrim Extended Duration
Dexatrim Gelcaps
Dexatrim Vitamin C/Caffeine Free
Dimetapp Cold & Allergy Chewable Tablets
Dimetapp Cold & Cough Liqui-Gels
Dimetapp DM Cold & Cough Elixir
Dimetapp Elixir
Dimetapp 4 Hour Liquid Gels
Dimetapp 4 Hour Tablets
Dimetapp 12 Hour Extendtabs Tablets
Naldecon DX Pediatric Drops
Permathene Mega-16
Robitussin CF
Tavist-D 12 Hour Relief of Sinus & Nasal Congestion
Triaminic DM Cough Relief
Triaminic Expectorant Chest & Head
Triaminic Syrup Cold & Allergy
Triaminic Triaminicol Cold & Cough
I just found out and called the 800# on the container for Triaminic and they informed me that they are voluntarily recalling the following medicines because of a certain ingredient that is causing strokes and seizures in children
Orange3D Cold &Allergy Cherry (Pink)
3D Cold &Cough Berry
3D Cough Relief Yellow 3D Expectorant
They are asking you to call them at 800-548-3708 800-548-3708 with the lot number on the box so they can send you postage for you to send it back to them, and they will also issue you a refund. If you know of anyone else with small children,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON.. THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF!
DO PASS ALONG TO ALL ON YOUR MAILING LIST so people are informed. They can then pass it along to their families.
To confirm these findings please take time to check the following:
http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO YOUR CHILDREN IN CASE THEY GIVE IT TO THEIR CHILDREN OR TO FRIENDS WHO HAVE CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EURO ENGLISH
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fw: Euro English
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRISPIN CATALAN Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM
To: ">" <@smtp104.vzn.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: francisco acebes del rio
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 2:00 PM
Subject: Euro English
Just scroll down and learn a new language.
Paco
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
European English :
The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility..
As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5- year phase-in plan that would become known as 'Euro-English'.
In the first year, 's' will replace the soft 'c'. Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard 'c' will be dropped in favour of 'k'. This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter. There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome 'ph' will be replaced with 'f'. This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.
In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where! more komplikated changes are possible.
Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling.
Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent 'e' in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.
By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as
replasing 'th' with 'z' and 'w' with 'v'.
During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary 'o' kan be dropd from vords kontaining 'ou' and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensi bl riten styl.
Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.
Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas.
If zis mad you smil, pleas pas on to oza pepl.
Heil
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE THE VISION
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change our Vision
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Krishnaswamy Narasimhan Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:04 PM
To: Krishnaswamy Narasimhan
Dear Insafcan,
Today, I came across this message in a blog and thought that it is worth forwarding. Here it is:
krishnaswamy.
"There was a millionaire who was bothered by severe eye pain. He consulted so many physicians and was getting his treatment done. He did not stop consulting galaxy of medical experts; he consumed heavy loads of drugs and underwent hundreds of injections.
But the ache persisted with great vigour than before. At last a monk who has supposed to be an expert in treating such patients was called for by the millionaire. The monk understood his problem and said that for sometime he should concentrate only on green colours and not to fall his eyes on any other colours.
The millionaire got together a group of painters and purchased barrels of green color and directed that every object his eye was likely to fall to be painted in green colour just as the monk had directed.
When the monk came to visit him after few days, the millionaire's servants ran with buckets of green paints and poured on him since he was in red dress, lest their master not see any other colour and his eye ache would come back.
Hearing this monk laughed said "If only you had purchased a pair of green spectacles, worth just a few rupees, you could have saved these walls and trees and pots and all other articles and also could have saved a large share of his fortune.
You cannot paint the world green." Let us change our vision and the world will appear accordingly. It is foolish to shape the world, let us shape ourselves first.
Lets change our vision..
Think simple,Live simple.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPEN LETTER TO SHAH RUKH KHAN
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[prohindu] Open letter to Mr. Shahrukh Khan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ramesh Chitnis Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:50 AM
Reply-To: prohindu-owner@yahoogroups.com
Hope Shahrukh Khan comes across this letter and reads it.
It may din some sense in him.
Open letter to Mr. Shahrukh Khan
February 1, 2010
Magh Krushna Trutiya, Kaliyug Varsha 5111
Your name is a household phenomenon in Indian and even beyond her borders. Your fame has put you in the Newsweek "most powerful people list" recently. However, as you may recall from your recent experience in New Jersey Airport, real life is a little different - it does not always follow the path predicted by a scriptwriter or director.
Of late, we have been reading about your opinions and statements on matters beyond the celluloid world. Nothing is wrong in it. You live in a free, democratic country and are entirely entitled to your opinion. But as a common man, also from the same soil, I think I have the right too to raise a few points that may not conform to your views of the real world.
I hope you will read it out.
When recently, the Pakistani players were not selected for the IPL, it was almost predictable that NDTV, the award-winning, mouthpiece of our Indian liberal media select you for your views and you certified that "It (Pakistan) is a great neighbour to have.We (India and Pakistan) are great neighbours. They are good neighbours."
I have a few words to say about those statements.
One may recall your effort to clarify the Pakistani team captain, Shoaib Malik"s apology to the Muslims, living all over the world, for failing to win the final T20 match against India, likely much to the embarrassment of a lot of Indian Muslims, as expressed by Shamin Bano, mother of the man of the match, Irfan Pathan. What was more embarrassing was your effort to try to defend Shoaib in a subsequent interview, "I don"t think he meant to segregate Muslims and Christians and Hindus and say this was a match between Islam and Hinduism. I don"t think that..."
I doubt whether Shoaib talked to you personally about his thought process at that time. You did not really have to respond for somebody else but perhaps you could not resist the temptation to show your brotherhood and solidarity.
This reminds us again of Dr Ambedkar"s observation that, "The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only.
Partition of India was what Pakistan wanted and got. It was painful to millions but many more millions in present India have been spared. Since then Pakistan has offered us only hatred. It has imposed on us three major wars, the Kargil insurgency, the Kashmir conflict, the series of serial blasts, the routine violation of border ceasefires, attacks on the Parliament House and the recent Mumbai 26/11attack.
Did you have these in mind when you talked about them being good neighbours?
In another interview you had tried to explain the concept of Islamic Jihad. "I think one needs to understand the meaning of jihad .. I"ve understood the essence that jihad is not about killing other people; jihad is about killing the badness in you."
May be you understand jihad better and deeper than the superficial meaning of what we, the rest of the mortal mankind, overburdened and terrorized by the inter-religious, intra-religious and sectarian violence that is plaguing the world in the name of Islam today, do. For we, the less educated, cannot really make a difference between Jihad and Qatl, between Jihad by heart / soul, Jihad by pen and Jihad by sword or between lesser and greater jihad.
We wonder, whatever its meaning may be, does it minimize the significance of the mindless killings that we see today in the name of Islam, across borders, all over the world? Does it change the nature of the killers whether you call them holy warriors, mujahidins, fedayeens or plane suicide bombers?
We agree with you that terrorism has no religion. But hopefully you will also agree with the people who perceive that most terrorist in the world today happen to believe in the scriptures of Islam. They actually believe that they themselves are the true Islamists.
The so called "moderate" Islamist, perhaps does not want to contradict them or may be does not dare to speak out against them. You have probably not forgotten the FIR against you for listing Prophet Mohammed as one of the most unimpressive personalities in history, the threats from which you had to skillfully wriggle out. Others who are not so fortunate, famous or flexible are suffering lifetime, as Tasleema Nasreen or Salman Rushdie would testify. For blasphemy in Islam is punishable with death, even for a believer.
Do I have to spell out the fate if it is a non-believer?
It is due to the inherent intolerance and exclusivity of Islam itself despite your effort to convince us that there is an Islam from Allah and very unfortunately, there is an Islam from the Mullahs
Here is an historical insight from writer Irfan Hussain, "The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes..all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed. Indeed, the presence of Muslim historians on their various campaigns has ensured that the memory of their deeds will live long after they were buried...Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster."
So why should the "non-believers" care to accept them? Why should the majority of Indians like to welcome back such disasters again?
Since partition, India has come a long way in progress and development to her current status and is projected as an economic superpower in coming decades while Pakistan is perceived as a failed state on the verge of disintegration.
What does India have to gain by offering neighbourly friendship to such a hostile and failed state?
India has never been an invader and is not in conflict of any other Muslim country. None of the wars and conflicts with Pakistan was instigated by India. In the current geopolitical situation, one can argue for the Muslim world"s grudge and anger against Israel or the west and USA but one fail to fathom why India should also be at the receiving end and why Indians should be the second largest group of people to die from terrorists attacks. Indian majorities do not have anything to do with the Danish cartoon or the death of Saddam Hussain; so why should they suffer from Islamic havoc on those occasions.
In almost all occasions of terrorism, questions are raised about possible role of Pakistan, its terror bases and its terrorist organizations, as either directly or indirectly involved. Be it state sponsored (as recently admitted by President Zardari) or by non-state actors, Pakistan or Pakistani born are prime suspect in terrorist activities all over the world. ISI has been accused of playing a role in major terrorist attacks including 9/11 in the USA, terrorism in Kashmir, Mumbai Train Bombings, London Bombings, Indian Parliament Attack, Varanasi bombings, Hyderabad bombings, Mumbai terror attacks or the attack on the Indian embassy in Kabul.
Do you believe these are marks of a good neighbour? Then what is the reason for your preaching of love towards Pakistan?
Perhaps, as you said, because it is your ancestor"s homeland, you have a soft feeling for Pakistan and cannot see the difference. On the eve of accepting an honorary doctorate from a British university, we heard you say, "I really believe we are the same ..when you come away from India or Pakistan you realize there is no Indian or Pakistani - we"re all together. We are - culturally, as human beings, as friends"
Which Pakistanis are you referring to?
The Pakistanis belonging to the land, admonished as the epicenter of global terrorism, not just by India or USA but even by its friendly allies like Iran or China.
Or is it the self-created, Talibanic Pakistan, who still imposes Jijya on the non believers or finds pleasure in blowing up girl"s schools.
Are you talking about its President class like the current Mr. Zardari, vowed to wage a 1,000-year war with India or the late Mrs. Bhutto who started Jihad in Kashmiri that lead to the exodus of Hindu minorities from the Muslim majority state of India, as refugees in their own country?
Are you referring to Pakistanis loyal to the ISI and the military who train their soldiers with only one objective, i.e. to fight Hindu India?
If your mind is concerned about the faceless mass of Pakistanis, does it also include the dwindling minorities?
Or are you just concerned about the celebrities and the social elites?
It is true SRK that we belong to the same human species but it is hard to stretch the similarities much further between "us" and "them".
We from the same original land of Bharat but we want to keep her intact, they want to break it into thousand pieces.
Our ancestors happen to be the same. We acknowledge and adore the heritage but they abhor and decimate whoever is available in an attempt to wipe out the link.
We are culturally the same. We have created the culture over centuries what they dream to destroy in moments.
Ours is a 10,000 year old civilization, theirs is a 62 years old country undoing whole human civilization.
We extend our hands repeatedly to promote friendship and amity; they give us ISI, Lashkar, Harkat, Kashmir, Kargil and 26/11 in exchange.
Do you think that the Indians nationals who died in all the above wars, the Indian soldiers who lost their lives in cross-border ceasefire violations or the Indian civilians who are killed by the ISI trained Islamic terrorists and their affiliates, in all those serial blasts, all over the country, willfully sacrificed their lives as a friendly neighbourhood gesture?
Can you face the families of the victims of Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus or the martyrs of the Kargil war and try to explain to them that "They are good neighbours. Let us love each other."
Can you explain why the two gunmen at Cama hospital, during the Mumbai carnage, asked the man who gave them water, what his religion was, and shot him dead when he said he was a Hindu?
If you cannot, then perhaps you understand why the majority of India does not consider Pakistan as a good neighbour to have.
Perhaps you believe that the peaceful religious co-existence that you created in your home (and we appreciate that) can be extended to the large world outside. As you rightly said, we Indians trust and do accept everybody but what you did fail to mention was that it is the Indic tradition, essentially coming out of its pre-Islamic Hindu ethos.
If you think otherwise, show us a single Islamic country where the non-believers enjoy the same equality as the believers. Since partition, the Hindus left over in Pakistan and Bangladesh has suffered terribly. Strictly Islamic countries, like Saudi Arabia, do not allow any other religions to exist. Hindus working in the Gulf countries are not allowed to practice their religion in public. Saudi Arabia insists that India sends only a Muslim ambassador. Hindu Muslim unity by and large has generally been a matter of Hindus trying to please or accommodate Muslims. One cannot forget when Vajpayee was extending his hand for peace Musharraf was planning the Kargil insurgency.
Let us remind you, your own statement "I am a Muslim in a country called India .We"ve never been made to feel this is a Hindu country."
Can you find me a Hindu in Pakistan who can reciprocate that sentiment?
Some years ago, another Mr. Khan, first name Feroze, from your fraternity was banned from entering Pakistan for saying, "India is secular unlike Pakistan".
That is the basic difference of the land of "Hindu" India from the Islamic "pure land" of Pakistan.
So please do not ask us to love Pakistan.
Please do not lump the people of India and Pakistan together. We Indians are proud to preserve our separate identity.
And please do not insult the land that gave you your life, name and fame, by claiming that her worst enemy, who wants to break her into 1000 pieces, is a great neighbour.
Otherwise it would be sad if somebody accuses you of putting your religion ahead of your country.
Please give it a thought.
Regards,
Arindam Bandyopadhyay.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group Start a New Topic
One strong Hindu can change the thought-current of the whole world...
Hindus should have fearlessness,the first prerequisite of a spiritual life.
To Post a message, send it to: prohindu@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: prohindu-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
MARKETPLACE
Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use.
__,_._,___
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEHRU'S GRANDFATHER'S NAME WAS GIYASUDDIN GAZI (MUGHAL)
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fw: Nehru Grandfather name was Giyasuddin Gazi (mughal)- Why hindus tolerate Muslims?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bharat J. Gajjar Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:39 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: Mohan Gupta
To: shelpa36@sprint.ca
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 11:32 PM
Subject: Nehru Grandfather name was Giyasuddin Gazi (mughal)- Why hindus tolerate Muslims?
From: "RAJAH "TheHindu""
Subject: Nehru Grandfather name was Giyasuddin Gazi (mughal)
Father of Moti Lal Nehru; The Story of Gangadhar
This is the true story of Ganga Dhar (not Ganga Dhar Nehru), father of Moti Lal Nehru. The adjunct 'Nehru' derived from the Persian word
'Nahr' meaning a canal or nullah, was adopted by Moti Lal, who, like all members of his family, had a fascination for alien Mohammedan
names mostly in Arabic or Persian. The adjunct 'Nehru' added a Persian flavor to his otherwise Hindu name. That was very desirable for the
> family, as will be explained later. Otherwise, under normal circumstances, his name would have been Moti Lal Dhar.
The adjoining picture of Ganga Dhar was obtained from Robert Hardy Andrews' book titled A LAMP FOR INDIA - The Story of Madame Pandit
(meaning Jawahar's first sister Vijay Lakshmi, alias Nan.) That book was first published by Prentice-Hall in 1967, a long time after the
> division of the country. But the fact on the scion of the dynasty, namely Ganga Dhar, had been kept a secret from the Indian public,
primarily, the Hindus.
It is now quite clear, as you will soon see, that Ganga Dhar was an assumed name. The man we now know as the paternal grandfather of Jawahar Lal (son of Moti Lal) was in reality a sunni Mohammedan; in fact he was a Mogul nobleman. The important question is why did he then adopt a Hindu kafir's name? In this case a Kashmiri Brahmin's name?
The reason has been explained in our previous article titled More on the Nehru Dynasty on our web-site http://www.swordoftruth.com not too
long ago. The accompanying picture featured was the same one that Jawahar Lal had referred to when he wrote in his autobigraphy that he
had seen a picture of his grandfather Ganga Dhar which protrayed him as a Mogul nobleman. Krishna Hutheesing (Jawahar's second sister) had
also mentioned in her memoirs, that their grandfather Ganga Dhar was the city Kotwal of Delhi (an important post) prior to 1857's uprising.
Bahadur Shah Zafar was still the sultan of Delhi. It was extremely unlikely that he would hire a Hindu for that very important post.
> Apparently, some investigations had been made on this count (please see Mahdi Husain's Bahadur Shah II and the war of 1857 in Delhi - 1987
edition) but no one could discover Ganga Dhar's name as the Kotwal of Delhi. Well, how could they? Ganga Dhar's real name then was
> Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (or something like that) which had been quietly changed to his new Hindu name, just before the English forces entered
the city. The sultan had replaced the earlier Kotwal as well as the City Governor Mirza Maniruddin. The latter had been dismissed by
Bahadur Shah Zafar on charges of spying for the English. The Naib Kotwal, a subordinate officer, was a Hindu; his name was Bhao Singh.
> And another Hindu, one Sri Kashinath was the thanedar of the Lahori Gate area of Delhi. Their names were found in the records but Ganga
Dhar was missing. Be that as it may, the fact remains that Ganga Dhar indeed was the grandfather of Jawahar and Krishna Hutheesingh.
And how did he look like? Ganga Dhar had a thick beard which would put even Pakistani president Tarar's beard to shame! Ganga Dhar's thick
moustache extended beyond his ears. He used to wear a Mogul cap and had in his both hands a long sword. Does that look like a Kashmiri
> Brahmin? No, not at all!
The Muslim Grandfather of Jawaharlal Nehru
Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (the word means 'kafir-killer') looked exactly like a sunni Mogul. Don't they say: 'If it looks like a duck, walks like a
duck and quacks like a duck, well, then it IS a duck.' The same was the case with Ganga Dhar, the Kashmiri Brahmin alias Ghiyasuddin Ghazi
the sunni Mogul. Only this vital information had been kept a secret from the Hindus of India, like so many other secrets of the family!
>
Our readers! If you can, please read up all references made in the memoirs of Jawahar Lal and Krishna Hutheesingh on Ganga Dhar. True to
the last whisker, the picture portrayed on our web-site, does represent a Mogul nobleman, so proudly mentioned by both the brother
and the sister. The element of secrecy crept in when it became clear that the Nehrus' Mogul ancestry, if made known to India's Hindu
public, might spell trouble for the forthcoming 'reign'. The 'Hindu by accident' got wise to the fact and acted as if he was indeed, son of a
Kshmiri Brahmin, Moti Lal Nehru by name.
Now, why was it at all necessary for Ghiyasuddin Ghazi to change his name to Ganga Dhar? Dhar is a well-known Kashmiri Hindu surname. Many
of these 'Dhars' were forced converted into Islam; their names were then changed to 'Dar' just to distance themselves from the Hindu
'Dhar'. The smart Moti Lal added the Persian epithet 'Nehru' thus making the name sound even more 'un-Hindu'.
The English army, quite unlike the Hindu army, was made of a different material. While Hindus let the defeated enemy go free (like Prithviraj
Chauhan had done and then regretted), the English were after each and every Mogul. They were shooting down all Mohammedans for fear of
facing another claimant to the Delhi throne. Panic and fear ran like wildfire among the Moguls. There was nowhere to flee. The city had
been surrounded by the 'firangi' forces and their allies, the Sikhs > and the Gurkhas. It was then that the wily Mohammedans came up with
the brilliant idea of name-changing. Ghiyasuddin became Ganga Dhar, almost like Yusuf Khan who had become Dilip Kumar, many years later.
Delhi was ransacked. All residents (both Hindus and Mohammedans) had to leave and take shelter under tents set up by the 'firangis' outside
city ramparts. For full two months they remained there in the tents > (like the Kashmiri Hindu refugees do today). During this time, the
English searched thoroughly each vacated home and discovered immense wealth, which was, by the rules of the game, confiscated by the new
rulers. A month later, the Hindus were asked to return to their homes. The Mohammedans were allowed to return even later.
In the aftermath, many Mohammedans fled to nearby cities not yet fully under the control of the English. Agra was such a city. It still had
considerable Mogul influence. And Jawahar's Mogul grandfather Ganga Dhar, with his entire family, left for Agra. How do we know that?
Jawahar states in his own autobiography that on their way to Agra, the English troops detained Ganga Dhar's family. Ganga Dhar told them that
they were not Mohammedans but Kashmiri Hindus. Jawahar explains in his > autobigraphy that the primary reason for the detention was their Mogul
features. The Kashmiri Hindus looked very much like Mohammedans from Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan and so on. And behold the English let Ganga
Dhar and his family go to Agra. The rest is history.
> [Afterword: The unbecoming fascination of the Nehrus for alien Mohammedan connections persisted even beyond the Mogul roots. Please
read up K.N. Rao's 'The Nehru Dynasty', Chapter XXIII. Reference is made there to Indira's (falsely described as the wife of Parsi Firoz
Gandhi when he was no such thing; he was a pure and simple sunni Mohammedan whose father Nawab Khan was a liquor supplier of Allahabad)
letters in the publication Two Alone, Two Together (letters between Indira Gandhi and Jawahar Lal Nehru) edited by Sonia Gandhi. The
publishers of this book were London's Hoddard and Stoughton. In that book is featured a letter by Indira to her father, Jawahar and it says:
"Some months ago when I was at Metheran, Masi (aunt) wrote saying that she had heard from some Parsis that it was written in their ancient
book that a Hindu of high family would marry into a Parsi family (here, a 'Hindu of high family' is Indira and 'Parsi' is Firoz, son of
sunni Nawab Khan) and their son would do great things - religious reform and so on. Masi asked me to inquire into the matter but it
quite slipped my mind. Last evening my mother in law (meaning Nawab Khan's so called Parsi wife, converted to islam at the time of her
> nikaah) came in a state of great excitement. She had also heard something of the sort, a slightly different version. According to her,
the son was the reincarnation of the Shah Behram of Persia.
"Baby's (meaning Rajiv Gandhi's) patri (horoscope) has arrived. I am enclosing it. It is written in Gujarati but I suppose you will be able
> to get it read. I am enclosing an English translation of the jyotishi's remarks. I am sending all this registered - please do the
same when you return it. The good thing about it is supposed to be that there are five planets in one house," and so on.
Quite clearly, the Nehrus could oscillate from the Mogul to the Persian at will as long as the roots appeared to be Mohammedan, alien
> or home made, and farther removed from indigenous roots the better. May we ask what great things did Rajiv do, other than stealing the
Bofors money and jeopardizing the lives of our jawans by supplying them with inferior canon? And what reform was she talking about other
than legalizing polygamy among the Mohammedans of India and granting them special privileges to talaaq their womenfolk, sans alimony? No
doubt Indira would not move against the fornication-prone Pakistani ruffians when they were shooting down unarmed Bengali Hindu civilians.
Some three millions were thus decimated but she had not even lifted a finger until the uproar inside the country became literally
uncontrollable. Then again, she let go the 93,000 Pakistani soldiers scot free without exacting a quid pro quo from the enemy. Neither did
she ask for the trial of Tikka Khan. And during that time, our jawans captured by the Paki army on the western front, were summarily shot in
prisons, against the Geneva regulations. Is it surprising that in Europe today one can purchase picture post cards of Hari Mandir Temple
with a comment on the back that Indira had secretly become Mohammedan and that is why she had chosen the Gurpurnima day (when the temple was
choc a bloc with women and children) to shoot the pilgrims down, in thousands. And when the 93,000 Pakis left for their home, they had put
on weight, were well-dressed and so on. She was some musalmanani of great piety although out of fear for divulging her Islamic roots, she
had refused to visit the Kaaba as desired by the Saudi Royal family.
Since when the Saudis have taken to inviting non-Mohammedans to visit Mecca?
Let us not be impressed by the 'five planets' and all such 'bakwaas'. What really happened is in front of our eyes, is this. In a country
where they would not even hurt a chicken, there were not one, not two but three assassinations in quick succession. And all three were
Gandhis. One was shot by a Hindu, the second was turned into pulp by two Sikhs and the third was pulverized by a Catholic lady of Tamil
extraction. In the mean time, the bastard son of Mohammad Yunus (still the custodian of the Netaji Papers), Sanjay aka Sanjiv, killed himself
in that plane accident. And the 'sarkari chacha' had died of syphilis, which apparently he had contracted in a local dhaba from a glass of
drinking water! Well! Who will believe that? What really happened can only be described as divine dispensation to preserve and protect our
'dharma rajya' of Bharat, that the Congress and the secularists along with the Mohammedan traitors were bent upon destroying for good!
------------------------
From: hilda raja
Subject: Nehru Grandfather name was Giyasuddin Gazi (mughal)
Helps to understand why this myopic vision of the Nehru-Ghandy(real name) the Sachar report,the Nanavati report and the lastest Automatic inclusion business...roots does matter! HR
-------
PLEASE READ "" THE KORAN AND KAFIR ( ISLAM AND THE INFIDEL ) BY A. GHOSH, {{{ ISBN 0-9611614-0-X }}}
----------
Vasu
What puzzles me is how Nehrus got away with it.
In my experience Hindus are scrupulous in associating with others.
In 1965 we wanted to perform a religious function in our house and our family priest invited other priests. Before starting the function, one Brahmin asked, " But who is the Yajaman?"
On knowing that Yajaman was Godbole some of them said, " We are Rigvedis, we will not chant Vedic mantras in the house of a Apasthambhi Brahmin! "
So, how did the Brahmins accept Nehru?
One important function is Shraddha - death anniversary of your father / mother. But for that history of previous 3 generations is needed.
Another function is in the month of Bhadrapad. Within a short period of 15 days we pay homage to all our ancestors especially those who had no sons, who died young, girls who died before getting married and any others. But this requires detailed history of the family. So, what were the Brahmins doing????
Women were more conservative than men and would not invite or visit house of another woman without knowing her background.
So, how did Hindu women accept women from Nehru family?
V S Godbole
England
----------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF ARYA SAMAJ TO HINDU SOCIETY/RELIGION
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF ARYASAMAJ TO our HINDU SOCIETY.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
satish gupta Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:13 AM
To: sher agwl
Cc: bhavesh merja
Dear Shri Bhai Sher Singhji Agarwalji,
I am fwding one of my emails on above issue fr yr infmn please; I wd appreciate to have yr views & comments on these . Thanks & Rgds/ S C Gupta.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent: Fri, 25 December, 2009 11:56:21 PM
Subject: YR DESIRE TO HV FM ME :CONTRIBUTION OF ARYASAMAJ TO HINDU SOC.
Respected Acharyaji,
You have greatly honoured me by asking my comments on above two subjects , which I had missed to answer to U promptly as I myself is still NOT in a proper shape & a little amount of pain in my right knee continues which does NOT permit me to concentrate on anything ; my apologies.
Against above two subjects, allow me to write on Contribution of Arya Samaj to Hindu Society first :
1. Swami Dayanand, Founder of Arya Samaj, wanted to rebuilt the entire Indian nation & HINDU Society in a NEW Mould where every Hindu / Arya had to believe firmly that this country " BHARATVARSH" is their own land.
2. He believed & proved that in our Vedas there was NO SUCH thing as UNTOUCHABILITY & he & through his Arya Samaj he succeeded in launching a Great movement against UNTOUCHABILITY which was followed up & taken up by Gandhiji & Congress in a BIG way during our Freedom struggle & post -independence.
3. Child Marriages : In Maharishi Dayanand's days, the child marriages were a very common factor. Maharishi Dayanand & his Arya Samaj propagated against this curse from our Hindu Society.
4. Arya samaj launched yet another related curse of Hindu Society , namely, marrying more than one wife / POLYGAMY : Arya Samaj through "Magic Lantern " Arya Pracharaks who travelled widely deep into the villages & towns successfully removed this evil from our Hindu society.
5.AryaSamaj successfully fought with the orthodox Brahmin Community & established that there was No example in the Vedas to worship the idol as God is OMNIPOTENT , OMNI_PRESENT & FORMLESS, once it is omnipresent, it cannot be confined under lock & key any where and Shri Ram & Shri Krishna are our God Like reality who had never- never committed any sin or any wrong doings ,hence only, Arya Samaj regards them as Bhagwaans.
6. Dayanand & Arya Samaj pleaded with the Orthodox Hindu Community to return to Vedas in true sense & to follow its dictates. He organized to obtain the Original Vedas from Germany & translated them in simple Sanskrit & Hindi along with his famous Book , " RIGVED BHASHYA" , "SOLAH SANSKARS"etc.
7.Aryasamaj propagated that all people are born equal & No one is Brahmin, Vaishya, Shatriya or Shudra by birth , but these are according to the profession one chooses and each of these sects are complimentary to each other & None is superior or inferior to the other.
8.Aryasamaj infused a thought amongst our Hindu Society that the West has NOT contributed anything towards the emancipation of our Country's welfare, rather the West owe to us for everything, every progress which they unjustifiably claim of theirs, including the invention of "ZERO".
9. Arya Samaj believed in a National Religion , based on INTENSE DEDICATED , TRUE , SELFLESS, FEARLESS NATIONALISM, a thought which it propagated amongst all the Hindus of India, preparing for Self-Rule & Freedom, based on equality ; its details are enshrined in " SATYARTH PRAKSH" by Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati. This was his life's greatest mission
10. Brought about widows re-marriages amongst the Hindus.
11. Stopped the most barbaric & most orthodox "Sati- Pratha" amongst the Hindus of our country.
12. AryaSamaj hit hard on the Blind faiths of Hindu Society & awakened them of these fake/ false Blind faiths which were spread amongst Hindu Society falsely by various orthodox Hindu organizations.
13. Shuddhi Prachaar of Arya Samaj was & still the Greatest contribution to Hindu Society , thereby bringing back our brothers & sisters whom we had lost to other religions owing to our orthodox faiths.
14. Spread of education to all irrespective of one being a boy or girl, of being a Brahmin or of other so called castes. Arya Samaj played its greatest role in starting women's Education every where.
15. In the field of Education again Arya Samaj played its greatest role in strengthening Hindu Society.
16. Arya Samaj opened its First Orphanage in Firozepore , followed by a chain of Orphanages all over the country so that our orphans may not adopt other religions like Islam or Christianity.
16. In the same way, Arya Samaj opened Homes for the widows & Destitude womens to accommodate , train them in some useful profession & to get them married to suitable partners in course.
17. Arya Samaj succeeded in removing the Pardha System from our Hindu Society and Brought Hindu women at par with men-folk. Hindu women of today greatest Debt to Arya Samaj : if Indian women could be seen in walks of our lives & in political Scene, all credit goes to Arya Samaj only else even our Freedom Struggle would NOT have been that Success.
18.Aryasamaj launched a movement successfully that studying of Sanskrit , Vedas & Upnishidas is NOT restricted to Brahamins alone but every caste had equal Rights to study these .
19. Arya Samaj gave Rights to wear Yagopaveet to every Hindu irrespective of one's birth.
20. In those days, any Hindu Travellers overseas, had to undergo penance & give away a lot of gifts to Orthodox Brahmins for allowing them to re-admit to Hindu Dharma, but Arya Samaj got rid of such ills from Orthodox Hindu Society.
21. Hindu Women have to pay back to Arya Samaj the Greatest , as if Aryasamaj had NOT come forward to improve their Social Rights, rights to educate themselves, right to read Vedas , Upnishads, Remarriages , equal rights as per men's , abolition of Dowry system, equal opportunity to select their partners etc.
22. Arya Samaj first time told the Hindu Society the difference of the meaning of good Governance & "own Independent Rule " & instigated people to demand self /own independent rule & to throw away the foreign yoke of slavery of the Britrishers. Arya Samaj was the only First Organization under Swami Dayanand who announbced for the FIRST Time that Bharatvarsh is only of Bharatvasies.
23. AryaSamaj emphasized on Swadeshi & patronising of Swadeshi Products only amongst all the Hindu Community .
24 . If HINDI remained the main stay of our freedom struggle, it was because of Arya Samaj , even today, Arya Samaj can take this credit. Maharishi Dayanand who was a Gujrati, wrote & spoke in Hindi only.
25. Arya Samaj gave to Hindu Orthodox Society , great Thinkers & Fearless National Leaders, Krantikaries, like : Lala Lajpat Rai, Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, Shri Arvind Ghosh, Bhai Parmanand, Bhai Shyamji Krishna Verma, Bhagat Singh, Ram Prasad Bismil, Bhai Bal Mukund, Madanlal Dhingra, Madan Mohan Malviye, Bhagat Singh, Krantiveer Bhai Mahaveer , Sufi Amba Prasad , Veer Savarkar, Swami Shraddhanand & Pandit Lekhram & others.
26. Arya Samaj always believed that begging is a worst thing , it is never liked by any one , rather it demoralizes the beggar never- never anything is achieved by begging or on knees bent ; hence Arya Samaj insisted the Hindu Society as a whole to stand on its own feet , on its own good deeds & to muster Courage , to come forward Selflessly to sacrifice one's life for the Nation .
Rgds.
S C Gupta.
Mumbai.Dear Bhai Satishji,
Sasneh Namaskar and Jai Hind.
There is no denying that the contribution of Arya Samaj has been tremendous for the Hindus and I well remember the spread of Hindi, devnagiri lipi in Nortrh and all over India over Pharsee and making of many schools and colleges based on Hindu/Arya Samaj concept were, among others, which saved India in so many ways.
However, with the onslaught of Islam and mainly after the independence India is becoming more and more Moslem and is right now under Moslem domination; it is only a matter of time that India will become a Islamic state, irrespective of the guidance of our greatest leaders in the past and even now, thanks to the Nehru/Gandhi dynasty, the greed of today's Jai Chands and the Saudi money and what not, that's what I am afraid.
So, the only conclusion I can draw from what is happening it seems to be God's wish or his plan and no one can stop it. The HIndus are a lost race and they are living in their past and they do not seem to care what happens to Hinduism or Bharatvarsh, so long as they can amass lots of wealth and name and fame, excepting a very few, but they are quite helpless under the present set of circumstances.
Khans have become kings in India and they are openly supporting Pakistan and the Indian government is behind them; then what more do you want?
We can be very proud of our past and of our highest ideas and philosophy in Hinduism and in Arya Samaj, but then we can also see the complete downfall and all the work done by leaders like Swami Dayanandji, sacrifice of Bhagat Singh, etc. going down the drain!
This may be quite painful but that is a fact we must accept and face and this is the heritage we are going to leave for our posterity,
Bhavdiy,
SHER AGRAWAL
WHERE TO CROSS THE BORDER
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[prohindu] Where to Cross The Border?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EagleSM23 Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:35 PM
Reply-To: prohindu-owner@yahoogroups.com
To: media_monitor5@yahoogroups.com
--- On Wed, 1/27/10, india-unity wrote:
Where to Cross The Border?
If You Cross The North Korean Border Illegally, You Get 12 Years Hard Labour.
If You Cross The Iranian Border Illegally, You Are Detained Indefinitely.
If You Cross The Afghan Border Illegally, You Get Shot.
If You Cross The Saudi Arabian Border Illegally, You Will Be Jailed.
If You Cross The Chinese Border Illegally, You May Never Be Heard Again.
If You Cross The Venezuelan Border Illegally, You Will Be Branded A Spy And Your Fate Will Be Sealed.
If You Cross The Cuban Border Illegally, You Will Be Thrown Into
Political Prison To Rot.
If You Enter Britain Illegally, You Will be Arrested, Prosecuted And Sent To Prison And Deported
If You Are A Moslem and a Pakistani or a Bangladeshi And Illegally Cross The Indian Border, You Get :
- A Ration Card,
- Passport (1 or more)
- Haz Subsidy,
- A Drivers License,
- Voter Identity Card,
- Job Reservation,
- Special Privileges,
- Credit Cards,
- Subsidized Rent Or A Loan To Buy A House,
- Free Education,
- Free Health Care,
- A Lobbyist In New Delhi ,with a ready Television Channel & group of
expert human right activists.
- The right to talk about secularism, which was not heard of back home.
And Of course - Voting Rights!!
Hats off to the ********* in Delhi & pseudosecularists in society, who
elect them.
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity: New Members 1
Visit Your Group Start a New Topic
One strong Hindu can change the thought-current of the whole world...
Hindus should have fearlessness,the first prerequisite of a spiritual life.
To Post a message, send it to: prohindu@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: prohindu-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
MARKETPLACE
Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use.
__,_._,___
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPUBLIC DAY AND CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY KURU
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[aryayouthgroup] INDIA'S REPUBLIC DAY & CONSTITUTION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rashtra1947@aol.com Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:11 AM
Reply-To: aryayouthgroup@yahoogroups.com
To: aryayouthgroup@yahoogroups.com
The British gave India back to their own stooges, the ideal duo to destroy India “by Constitution” having conquered her by “Sword & Gun” earlier. One was the “servant of islam” (Gandhi), the other a sworn ENEMY of Hindus and at the same time a great admirer of foreigners (Nehru).
Barrister Nehru, in particular, knew that to destroy the Hindus he had to reduce their TERRITORY and NUMBERS and destroy their UNITY and MORALE (SPIRIT). He would show his contempt of everything Hindu. He would deny them recognition in public and any mention in Constitution. He would avoid their company in public, ridicule them, never smile at them, never consult them on any State matter, never appreciate their genius and achievements but give key posts to Muslims and Christians. He would take Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Edwina Mountbatten for his constant companions while his propaganda machines described him as a patriot and a great freedom fighter.
In the event when the British left it was Nehru who cried the most, begging of the Viceroy to stay on in office as Governor General. He gave a ceremonial send off at Mumbai docks to the last British military unit leaving India. At the same time he called the Jawans of Indian National Army (INA) traitors and dismissed them all in disgrace! Any fool could see Nehru’s love of India and our Jawans.
Nehru’s Constitution neglected none more than the brave armed forces of the country who were seen as a symbol of aggression meant to be disbanded in disgrace under Gandhi’s ethos of “Ahimsa Parmo Dharma” after Nehru assumed the role of moral master of the world. Unconditional surrender of Lahore and withdrawal from East Bengal were their worst HUMILIATION and the lowest point of their self esteem, pride and honour. The only victory worth celebrating by them was turned into shame & disappointment when East Bengal was returned to the ENEMY after its capture by our Jawans. The army is still smarting under their previous humiliation through “cease fires” and inconclusive wars.
Nehru’s Constitution was meant to push the Hindus to back row, ensuring only bad news for them. For this he gave the Muslims free hand to massacre the Hindus, starting with Noakhali, later West Punjab and finally the complete extermination of Hindus in North Kashmir. One never saw Nehru sad even for a second over the rape and abduction of tens of thousands of Hindu girls whom we regard “devis”.
It was, in deed, the extension of the British colonial policy of suppressing the Hindus in order to continuously demoralise them, Hindu temples, being Nehru’s special target, never got any protection as per Constitution. Nehru’s Constitution was utterly useless with regard to large scale conversions of Hindus to foreign religions since Partition, that itself was his deliberate State policy. Thus the Hindus have always been getting bad news starting with the surrender of territory on historic scale.
Broken and bleeding India began with her DEFEAT at Partition after which the country emerged in greatly reduced borders. Did anyone see Nehru show remorse or regret? In fact the clever FOREIGN AGENT NEHRU turned the worst ever historic defeat and surrender into India's “Independence”!
Operation “Blue Star” (attack on Harimandir Sahib) in Amritsar in June 1984 was the extension of Nehru’s policy of weakening the Hindus by destroying the Sikhs. Indira’s propaganda machine described it as her patriotic act but never mentioned her HIGH TREASON when she returned East Bengal to the enemy after its capture or when she schemed against the Tamils (of INDIAN origin) in Sri Lanka who desperately needed “Mother India” for help.
Diaspora in the eyes of Nehru was extension of Hindu India and, therefore, to be IGNORED or treated with contempt. His Constitution does not recognise them or extend protection to them in any way. Hindus are as vulnerable in South Kashmir as in Malaysia.
The litmus test of this Constitution are two words, “KHANS” and “SONIA”. The former reign supreme in Bollywood and the latter reigns supreme in India's PARLIAMENT.
For the Hindus, both men and women, it is the Constitution “of the enemy, by the enemy and FOR THE ENEMY.” It does not lay down strictly, “No conversion of Hindus!“ and “No conversion of Hindu girls at marriage!”
Indians still laugh & celebrate on January 26th and August 15th every year but not weep & cry.
COMMENT ON CONSTITUTION
(CELEBRATING THE LIMBLESS WINGLESS HINDU BASHING REPUBLIC)
The Constitution of India has demoralised the nation to the extent that the COMBINED “public opinion” of ONE BILLION can neither “show the door” to the Italian-born symbol of European Reoccupation (Indian version of Columbus) or try RAJIV, the BOFORS CHOR, in any court of Law.
Because of this treacherous Constitution the HINDUS today are in more precarious situation in South Asia than before the Constitution was enacted in January 1950.
Background knowledge of
-Hindu DISUNITY due to centuries of slavery,
-Devastatingly destructive role of Islam and Christianity in ENSLAVED India,
-Hindus’ suicidal inability to provide strong, resolute and inspiring LEADERSHIP in order to lead them to victory in fight for “Akhand Bharat”, and to ensure the honour and dignity of native womanhood (Italian born Sonia Maino) and manhood (the Khans of Bollywood).
-The “I am all right, Jack” mentality of the Hindus. It means universal apathy and detachment towards the suffering fellow Hindus. When West Punjab and East Bengal were being ethnically cleansed in violence and bloodshed not one Muslim was “touched” in U.P. and Maharashtra or thrown out of Kerala and Tamil Nadu. On the contrary, we see Mujahideen from as far afield as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Somalia and even Chechnya, fighting along side the local terrorists in South Kashmir. British born Muslims have gone to Afghanistan to kill the British soldiers. Hindus in Bharat did not teach the Muslims a lesson when South Kashmir was ethnically cleansed in 1989.
-The nature of “HINDU BASHING” ruling political party,
-The perpetual rule of ONE anti national and corrupt Dynasty.
is an essential pre-requisite to understand this Comment.
The Indian RULING ESTABLISHMENT will "celebrate" Bharat’s (Middle India’s) REPUBLIC DAY on 26th. January. On this date in 1950 her new Constitution was enacted. Let us expose the COWARDICE and TREACHERY of its writers.
What we call “India” or “Bharat” is in reality MIDDLE INDIA. The Constitution ought to have stated Pakistan and Bangladesh as Western India and Eastern India respectively. The Constitution of West Germany did not accept the division of the country in order to acknowledge the existence of East Germany.
The last civil war in India (1947) was FOUGHT between the Muslims (aggressors) and “The Rest.” (defenders). The next war too will be fought between “The Rest” and the Muslims.
Last time the Muslims had full support of the Christians (the British). The next time, too, the Muslims will have the full support of the Christians (Italians). What guidance does one get from the Constitution of India with this regard? Constitution is supposed to be the eyes and ears of a blind nation.
The first tragic thing about the Constitution is that it “stinks” of anti Hindu bias. And it further “stinks” of TREASON by not mentioning “Akhand Bharat” to which the whole nation, not only Mr. MK Gandhi & Bandit JL Nehru, were supposedly committed till the “last drop of blood in their bodies”. Therefore, as per Constitution the blood in India is water that can be coloured green in Lahore but left pale yellow in Delhi.
The “Vidhan” does not mention the five provinces that were meant to be integral part of AKHAND BHARAT. They had been surrendered unconditionally- without referendum, reason, challenge or FIGHT to the indigenous Muslims two and a half years earlier. The Muslims of India had the “royal” privilege to move over to the newly created ISLAMIC countries, or stay put back in India to enjoy full citizenship rights as per Constitution.
No Indian citizenship can buy any property in South Kashmir as per Constitution. (Article 370).
Two million Indians were massacred and 15 million forcibly expelled from their ancestral homes. Such an unprecedented large scale exodus had never before taken place in India's entire history. But it finds no mention in Constitution showing that the top leaders Gandhi and Nehru regarded the PEOPLE OF INDIA as Hitler regarded the Jews.
There is no mention of a Memorial to the Holocaust of 1947. The Constitution does not refer to the slavery of KARACHI and DHAKA while declaring DELHI independent. The by-products of this Constitution are THREE flags (Pakistan, Bharat and Bangladesh) flying in the capital of India where a yielding conceding appeasing, gentle and uninspiring Shrimati occupies Rashtrapati Bhawan as the Supreme Commander and President.
There had been countless Muslim invasions and continuous occupation of DELHI since 1192 AD but never were vast areas (one third of India) evacuated by the HINDUS as in 1947 due to historic collapse by barristers NEHRU & GANDHI.
The Constitution reflects the most humiliating defeat and surrender of SECULARISM while the leaders claimed to be staunchly committed to secularism. Obviously, the Constitution regards secularism mandatory only for the Hindus and the Sikhs but NOT for the Muslims. The Sikh who shouts, “Secularism to be acceptable in Amritsar has to be RAMMED DOWN THEIR THROATS in Lahore,” runs the risk of being put behind bars for life.
Here are the main flaws in this Constitution-
1. No mention of the unconditional surrender of Secularism, Do countries abandon their fundamental commitments so quickly like this?
2. Unconditional surrender of vast TERRITORIES. What is the meaning of patriotism then?
3. Not defining the Muslims as traitors or separatists at the same moment when Bandit NEHRU saw the “glow of his own freedom”. At the outbreak of World War 2 all the German and Japanese citizens in America and England were interned and not released till the end of war. In India the Constitution declared them to be as patriotic as the loyal Hindus. This was the ugliest joke on all the people of Bharat.
4. While LAHORE is outside the ambit of this Constitution SRINAGAR is not. The result? Total loss of tourism and Hindu life and property in extreme peril.
5. Obvious bias against the majority community (the HINDUS) but at the same time showing excessive concern for the well-being and advancement of the MUSLIMS, e.g. Hajj subsidies and reservation of jobs.
6. The State of Jammu & Kashmir was conceded special and separate identity vide Article 370. Nehru desperately needed the violence and unrest there to take the nation’s mind OFF his own treason at partition. That is why he ordered our advancing troops to stop dead, and not move on, to recover North Kashmir fully.
7. While India is the fountainhead of true RELIGIONS on earth, something that was to be celebrated with great joy and pride, the Constitution does not reflect this at all but treats native and FOREIGN religions at par. In Ayodhya the Mohammed of Arabia is put above Sri Rama of BHARAT. A Constitution that does not defend and lift the image of the country's OWN divine genius is not worth the paper it is written on. For betraying India’s own divine beings, her constitution is a document of national shame. “Gaurav” will remain a mere word, not a reality.
None of the native Avataras, Rishis and Gurus is mentioned even once in this Constitution. It ought to have begun with a Shloka in Sanskrit from Bhagwat Gita.
8. This Constitution gives no direction to ensure that the SUPREME COMMANDER of MIDDLE INDIA must be a COMMITTED HINDU. A wrong person, a devious Muslim or Christian can easily occupy this post and ensure the destruction and defeat of the Indian Army. This Constitution plays with the very security & survival of the Republic.
9. The Constitution adopted the same flag for the country that belonged to All-India Congress Party with one change. Instead of "charkha (spinning wheel) MIDDLE INDIA was to have ASHOKA CHAKRA on its flag. This was a concession to Dr Ambedkar, a Buddhist, whose disdain of Hindu religion was similar to that of JL Nehru.
10. Against popular demand for “VANDE MATRAM” as the national anthem the Constituent Assembly chose “JANA GANA MANA” at the behest of Jenab JL Nehru, half Muslim himself.
11. What direction, impulse or guideline does this Constitution provide to the State to ensure the safety of the people of INDIAN origin living abroad, e.g., UGANDA, FIJI, BANGLADESH, PAKISTAN, KASHMIR, NEPAL, SRI LANKA, MALAYSIA and AUSTRALIA? Its outlook on the EXPATRIATE Indians is that of a flock of sheep who passively watch the wolf carrying off one of them for his meal. In several countries DUAL NATIONALITY is granted automatically as per Constitution in order to facilitate initiative and travel but NOT in India.
Having said all this, one can ask, “What should have been a proper Constitution for MIDDLE INDIA?"
What was a genuinely patriotic HINDU Prime Minister of the newly independent BHARAT expected to do?
1. Declare Middle India as HINDU RASHTRA if separatist breakaway countries on EITHER SIDE had to be ISLAMIC. The world sees clear identity of Pakistan as an Islamic State while India lives on under mongrel Ideology and expected to remain an unstable country where everyone would fight for own rights and privileges. Clearly, Secularism to be decent in DELHI had to be rammed down their throats in LAHORE.
2. The Constitution had to designate the MUSLIMS as “persona non grata” or "guest workers" like the TURKS in Germany.
3. The Constitution had to spell out clearly that only a COMMITTED & PRACTISING HINDU could become the Supreme Commander and the Prime Minister, as also the Governors of the States.
4. A new FLAG had to be designed with NO resemblance with the flag of any political party.
5. “Vande Matram” had to be the national anthem of Bharat.
6. THE Truncated province of Punjab had to be given a new name to match REALITY. The new name could be DOAB (Land of Two Rivers) or simply EAST PUNJAB that rhymes with WEST BENGAL.
7. The Constitution had to stipulate the final date for the closure of all the seditious MUSLIM universities like Aligarh and Deoband, and sanction the establishment of HINDU universities, at least one per State.
8. The aspiration to unify the country had to be clearly stated. In the Constitution of West Germany this was stated in Article 1. The patriotic Germans did NOT accept two Germanys. Thus any East German escaping to the West was automatically given the German citizenship and rehabilitated. Such patriotism and genius was totally lacking in those “mental dwarfs / former slaves” who framed the Constitution of Partitioned Indian Secular State.
9. The status of the MAJORITY community, the HINDUS, remained as low “as per Constitution” as it was during the British Raj when the Christians used to ally themselves with the MUSLIMS- both being foreigners, against the NATIVE Hindus. Partition itself was the proof of that core “unity of purpose” of the foreigners and their animosity towards the Hindus.
A Constitution is like the rudder of a ship, small yet powerful enough to keep the ship on course. The ship called “BHARAT” has a hull that is leaking on every side. It is sailing on an erroneous course. There is no provision in Constitution for ejecting the corrupt captain and crew like body waste. Scoundrels in top families, like Rajiv Gandhi, can get away with importing brides from abroad, thus degrading native womanhood. There is also no provision to try and punish goons like BOFORS CHOR and confiscate their ill-gotten wealth.
The Constitution of India engenders NO loyalty to the country or its TERRITORY. It proved useless when Indira Gandhi returned our own territory (East Bengal) back to the ENEMY after its capture in 1972. There was NOTHING in Constitution to stop her from doing so. She could not be tried for HIGH TREASON and executed or hanged to death for that crime. In sharp contrast we see the Constitutions of Pakistan and Bangladesh that prohibit the return of territory to India under any circumstances.
This “Vidhan” of Bandit Jawaharlal NEHRU does not specify whether the country's identity is HINDU or MONGREL. In contrast the United Kingdom is a CHRISTIAN country with her own State religion (Church of England). The Constitution does not commend ONE LAW FOR ALL. In some parts of Bharat the Muslims have their own Sharia Law.
The Constitution does not defend the rights and dignity of girls being seduced, married and CONVERTED. There is NO assurance to the nation that its Secularism will be guaranteed if the Muslims OUTNUMBER the Hindus due to disproportionate increase in their numbers. It has NO provision to ensure that the foreigners do not convert the natives with incentives and rewards.
The Hindu “LION” was put in the cage called “VIDHAN” and continuously starved. Weak and emaciated, and lacking self confidence and self esteem, it says to one Abdul Kalam, “Sir, be our supreme commander and you do not have to be a Hindu,” and to one Sonia Maino, “Madam, become our prime minister and we will also have your son rule us for ever. He may, if he so desires, bring his bride from Venezuela, Malaysia or Columbia.” Where on earth do we see such despicable COLLAPSE of the whole nation?
The pathetic plight of the Hindus from Kashmir to Kerala is the proof that the quality of the Constitution that was inflicted on MIDDLE INDIA was (and still remains) pathetic.
The Constitution of the UNITED States of America has such vigorous and dynamic impulses going out that the attack of Nine Eleven resulted in the destruction of the Government of Taliban in Afghanistan. The Constitution of Middle India lacks vitality to the extent that despite the claims the Indian army has not been able to advance even one centimetre across the “cease fire line”.
The WORST thing about this Constitution is that it regards India's existence from MIDNIGHT 14/15 August 1947 with full compliments to the cowards who agreed to the surrender of India. Had Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose been alive no one would have dared to cut, chop and fragment India in this vulgar manner or invaded Kashmir. Regrettably, there is little mention of the great Hindu Kings and the indigenous civilisation of the past.
Let the nation judge for itself and then scrap this Document of TREACHERY, and write up a new one to recognise the GENIUS and POTENTIAL of Hindu nation or even to match the vigour and dynamic of the Constitution of the United States of America. The era of “Indian Coolie” is LONG PAST.
-------------
Kuru
26 January 2010
===========
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity: New Members 16 New Photos 1
Visit Your Group Start a New Topic
website-www.aryayuvakparishad.com
For yuva udgosh newsletter send your address,phone-no & email address
Please Share Your Thoughts,Activities,Social welfair activities,Vedic Sidhants, National Integration & your valueable views on Arya Youth group or email at aryayouthgroup@yahoogroups.com or aryayouth@gmail.com
The Arya Youth Group is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the Arya Yuvak Parishad views or opinions. Please note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the sender have been verified.
The opinion express in the group is of the author & not neccessary reflect the opinion of group owner.
contact Anil Arya(National President)-09810117464,09868051444
Mahender Bhai(National Secretary)-01120012237,9868246754
D.K. Bhagat(Press Co-ordinator)09312406810,1120298026,
Shanker Dev(AryaSamaj Kabir Basti Office Manager)-09868002130
Office time-12am to 7.00 pm weekly off-Thursday
MARKETPLACE
Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use.
__,_._,___
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOURNEY OF THE SOUL
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FW: [IndianVoice] SPIRITUAL JOURNEY OF THE SOUL---7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assudo Bhatia Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:54 AM
To: agrasen@gmail.com, lbdaswani@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To:
From: gbsub@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:33:39 -0500
Subject: [IndianVoice] SPIRITUAL JOURNEY OF THE SOUL---7
Date: Jan 17, 2010 5:11 PM
Attachments: --static--bg_starsblue_1.gif
,
The Doctrine of reincarnation is widely accepted. Christ himself has, if not directly,at least indirectly,proclaimed the theory of reincarnation when He told His disciples that John the Baptist was Eliah. The most learned of the Christian fathers, Origen had clearly declared:" Every man received a body for himself according to his desires in former lives". There is no great thinker in the past nor any in the present who had not accepted, expressly or tacitly, the logical conclusions in the doctrine of reincarnation. Gautama, the Buddha constantly made references to his previous births. Virgil and Ovid regarded the doctrine as perfectly self-evident. Among the jews of his age,reincarnation was widely accepted, says Josephus. Solomon`s Book of Wisdom says,"To be born in sound body with limbs is a reward of the virtues of past lives." A learned son of Islam is reported to have declared," I died out of the stone and I became a plant; I died out of the plant and became an animal ; I died out of an animal and became a man; Why then should I fear to die? When did I grow less by dying/ I shall grow out of man and shall become an angel".
In the latter times this philosophical belief was accepted as a doctrine by the German philosophers, Goethe and others. Among the recent philosophers, Max Muller, Hume and Spencer have recognised this doctrine as incontrovertible. Even poets like Tennyson, Wordsworth, to mention a few names have sung about the theory. The infant prodigy, Mozart, is a spectacular instance which can not be explained away: to be logical we must accept the idea of the continuity of the embodiedd souls. That genius wrote sonatas at the age of four, played in public at the age of five, composed his first opera at the age of seven. Can we call this incident as an accident or chance and forget about it? Pl. think.
G.Balasubramanian
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group Start a New Topic
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this group are the complete responsibility of the writer. Either the moderators or the owners of the group do not have any responsibility either for the accuracy or the content of the messages one way or the other
The messages here are not considered as "SPAM" if the contact and remove information are given in the message.
To send messages IndianVoice@egroups.comIf you do not want to receive email digest, please go to membership and click the edit and click "No Email" then click save changes. You will not receive email digest but still you can look at messages posted at your will.
u will not receive email digest but still you can look at messages posted at your will.
MARKETPLACE
Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use.
__,_._,___
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW ASPIRIN
agrasen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fw: NEW ASPIRIN very important, please do not delete
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H.L. Somani Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM
To: Sher Agrawal , Bhagwan Rughwani , Akshay Chandak , abhay chandak , Naveen Sawhney , pradeep gupta , Prem Vohra , chirawa@comcast.net, pitambar somani , mohan ahluwalia , om seth , RAJESH DHAWAN , ashok d chandak
--- On Sat, 1/23/10, Satyendra Kela wrote:
From: Satyendra Kela
Subject: NEW ASPIRIN very important, please do not delete
To: "devendra maheshwari"
Date: Saturday, January 23, 2010, 10:54 PM
Subject: NEW ASPIRIN very important,
please do not delete
Subject: NEW ASPIRIN
IMPORTANT READ.....
Something that we can do to help ourselves. Nice to know.
Bayer is making crystal aspirin to dissolve under the tongue. They work much faster than the tablets.
Why keep aspirin by your bedside?
About Heart Attacks
There are other symptoms of an heart attack besides the pain on the left arm.
One must also be aware of an intense pain on the chin, as well as nausea and lots of sweating, however these symptoms may also occur less frequently.
Note: There may be NO pain in the chest during a heart attack.. The majority of people (about 60%) who had a heart attack during their sleep, did not wake up. However, if it occurs, the chest pain may wake you up from your deep sleep.
If that happens, immediately dissolve two aspirins in your mouth and swallow them with a bit of water.
Afterwards:
- phone a neighbor or a family member who lives very close by
- say "heart attack!"
- say that you have taken 2 aspirins..
- take a seat on a chair or sofa near the front door, and wait for their arrival and...
~ do NOT lie down ~
A Cardiologist has stated that, if each person, after receiving this e-mail, sends it to 10 people, probably one life can be saved!
I have already shared the information- - What about you?
Do forward this message; it may save lives!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
