INDIA AND THE LOT OF HINDUS AND HINDUISM, DWINDLING DOWN THE DRAIN

Sher Agrawal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fw: [prohindu] Karunanidhi criticises Hindu practice......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bharat Gajjar Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:54 AM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient

----- Original Message -----
From: Mohan Gupta
To: omar@sansad.nic.in
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 12:26 AM
Subject: [prohindu] Karunanidhi criticises Hindu practice......




Sh. vadakkumnathanji,

Many people are not aware that about half the Bhaaratiya ruling ministry is of those people who are non-Hindus. In ministry there are many Christian ministers with hindu name. Sonia is commander in Chief of ruling party who is Christian and want to sspread Christianity in Bhaarat. Due to her cross is put on Bhaaratiya coins. An Christian nun was awarded the status of Saint. To get the status of saint for a nun , Christians miniister of Bhaaratiya government to Rome on the expensse of exchequer. The purpose for going to Rome of some Christian minster of Bhaaratiya government that an indian nun be made Saint. It is Chriatian affair but whole media is making indian affair. Most likely in honour of this phoney saint, there might be holidays to publc, her picture be prited on notes and currencies. Due to Sonia , Bhaarat has got 4 Chrstianm chief Ministers, while population of Christians is about 3% in Bhaarat. To please Sonia and to get favour from Sonia and congress party all kinds of media is exaggerating the news that Christians are tortured by pro-Hindu organisations, while there is no news when Hindus are tortured by Christians. In most of the cases Chritians claims are false.
Man Mohan claims to a Sikh but actually he is a slave person and has no personality of her own. Man Mohan is Sikh, does not have a pride like patrioticSikh. Being a slave for himself, Man Mohan Sing being slave himself thinks slavery is in the fate of Bhaaratiya people for ever.

Ruling party gives protection to Muslim and Christian terrorists. To cpmpensate terrorist activities of muslims and Christians blame of terrorist is being imposed on hindus.


Karuna nidhi a chief minister of a state has nothing more important to worry about than the tilak and Brahims' thread, no wonder the state is in such a mess, what a senile clown. He writes poems when someone is killed, like his PM who loses sleep when a terrorist gets killed. what a shameful lot of morons.


Until & unless the terrorism will reach to the kith & kin of all these pretending moderates, politicians, Human Right activists, Commies, Mullahs, Congies and all Madamma worshippers, this is not going to address in such a magnitude what we are talking about. These persons are having links with the allien religion / ideology to topple this country and it is evident from their writings, Documentary & reporting of incidents. They are 100% loyal to their masters and even they are ready to sell their .................

See for example - Congress is sold out to Christians :-
CEO - Sonia Antonio Maino & her Christian Coterie : -
Their loyalty to Christianity is because their Wife's are christian's
1. Anand Sharma
2. Manish Tiwari
3. Satish Sharma
4. Vayalar Ravi
5. Ajit Joggi
5. two or more persons are there
Ambika Soni - ambika@sansad.nic.in;

Many Indians are not aware that Arundhati Roy, despite her Hindu-sounding name, is a Christian. Similarly UPA's
Ambika Soni is also a Christian. Thier names fool people. Arundhati's real name is Suzanna Arundhati Roy, who was born to a Syrian Christian mother, Mary Roy.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Ambika-Soni

They are Christians or Converted
1. A.K. Antony
2. Oscar Fernandes
3. Margaret Alwa
4. YSR Reddy
"RAJDEEP SARDESAI" ; a journalist


Congress Rajya Sabha MP, Mr.Radhakant Nayak, a Convert Christain,

Please share other names of these groups, so that at least for general knowledge we can give the names to our childrens - Who is who like questions ?
Likewise we can circulate the antacedents of persons working in Printing & Media sector.
YES, YOU ARE RIGHT. WHENEVER THESE INCIDENTS OCCURES, THESE ANTI HINDU CHANNELS WILL BRING

A CONGRESS LEADER, A COMMUNIST & A BISHOP OR A MULLAH. OF COURSE THERE WILL BE A LONE HINDU

TO EXPLAIN THE REALITY. FOR THE HINDU WHO REPRESENT THE HINDU GROUPS, IT WILL BE A HERCULEAN

TASK TO EXPLAIN THE GROUND REALITY BECAUSE IT WILL BE A ONE MAN VERSUS A GROUP AFFAIR.



There was A DEBATE ON NDTV . IRONICALLY, AMONG PARTICIPANTS, MOST OF THE HINDUS WERE SILENTLY & SOME EVEN OPENLY SUPPORTING THE MINORITIES. THE HINDUS HAVE NOT LEARN ED A

LESSON. WHEN THEY WILL LEARN IT ?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Hindu media is needed all over Bhaarat. There should be lots of pro- Hindu such channels

vision of the channel :

This channel should talk about the Ancient Civilization and stories of India. Sort of the history and geographic channel for India.
This Channel should reach out to every segment of the Indian population that has never been heard. There will be news, business and entertainment segments as well.
This channel should be apolitical and should be run in a business like fashion.

I wish that it be broadcast across India, Nepal, America, UK and Australia first and then followed by other friendly nations.

----- Original Message -----
From: vadakkumnathan ind
To: haindavakeralam@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [haindavakeralam] Karunanidhi criticises Hindu practice......



DEAR MR. MOHAN GUPTA,
WHEN KARUNANIDHI MADE NASTY COMMENTS ABOUT LORD RAM, CONGRESS PARTY STOOD FIRMLY
BEHIND HIM. ABHISHEK SINGH SANGVI SAID THAT AS THE LEADER OF A DRAVIDIAN PARTY, KARUNANIDHI HAS
THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS HIS VIEWS.

EVEN NOW, CONGRESS PARTY EITHER INDIRECTLY SUPPORTS HIM OR KEEPS SILENCE. TODAY I WAS
WATCHING VOICE OF INDIA ( VOI ) CHANNEL . VOICE OF INDIA'S COVERAGE OF BJP'S ELECTION MEETING
IN JAIPUR WAS EXCELLENT.IRONICALLY, NONE OF THE BJP LEADERS INCLUDING L.K.ADVANI TRIED TO
FOCUS THE REAL ISSUES OF HINDUS. WHY THEY ARE AFRAID? THEY HAVE TO EXPLAIN THE PEOPLE OF
RAJASTHAN & MADHYAPRADESH ABOUT THE REPEATED INSULTS & HINDU BASHING BY THE UPA ESPECIALLY
THE LIKES OF KARUNANIDHI.

REGARDS.........SHIVSHANKAR.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mohan Gupta
To: haindavakeralam@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2008 9:04:30
Subject: [haindavakeralam] Karunanidhi criticises Hindu practice......



----- Original Message -----
From: Yashwini1@yahoo. com

Hindus needs to ask Karunanidhi why do Christians wear the cross in their
necks.
And also why Sikhs wear turban, Muslims wear their religious symbols in
pendants and Jews wear kippah skullcap? Karunanidhi' s views against Ram
Sethu are well
known. In his personal life, He has married three times. His children are
:M.K. Stalin, M.K. Azhagiri, M.K Muthu, M.K.Tamilarasu, daughters are Selvi &
Kanimozhi

1) http://ia.rediff. com/news/ 2007/sep/ 17sethu2. htm
2) http://newstodaynet .com/2007sud/ jan07/1201ss1. htm
3) http://kanchikamako ti.blogspot. com/search? q=Jaggi+vasudev
4) http://www.hindu. com/thehindu/ 2003/08/19/ stories/20030819 02600400. htm
5)
http://pseudosecula rism.blogspot. com/2007/ 09/karnunandhi- has-lost- his-mental- balance.html

Karunanidhi criticises Hindu practice of sporting 'tilaks'
Times of India

CHENNAI: Flaying the Hindu practice of smearing ash or saffron or sporting a
'tilak' on the forehead for yet another time, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister

M Karunanidhi on
Wednesday questioned the need for "such things in a country which preached
equality of all religions."

Karunanidhi also questioned the rationale behind Brahmins wearing sacred
thread.

"What is the need for these things in a country that has accepted all
religions and preached equality of the same," he asked in a poem penned by
him in the wake of caste-related violence in Madurai yesterday in which one
person was killed in police firing.

He had on earlier occasions also ridiculed the practice of smearing ash or
saffron on the forehead.

The DMK chief had made similar remarks on certain other Hindu customs
earlier and described Hindus as "robbers". But later he clarified that he
meant Hindus were robbers "who stole hearts".

In the height of the Sethusamudram controversy, he had described Lord Ram as
a "drunkard" and wondered whether he was a qualified engineer to have built
the Ramasethu.

In the poem, Karunanidhi described truth as God, adding that all people were
equal before God and described as "ignorance" those who were not aware of
it.

"Caste differences are the offshoot of the branches called differences based
on religion... lets chop off not only the branches but also uproot the tree
to witness the emergence of a beautiful concept called equality," he said.

He also described as useless the face-off between believers and
non-believers on the concept of God and said there was no point fighting
over which faith was supreme.

http://timesofindia .indiatimes. com/Karunanidhi_ criticises_ Hindu_practice_ of_sporting_ tilaks/articlesh ow/3677616. cms