E MAIL FROM AND TO DR. SWAMY

agrasen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[prohindu] How to wipe out Islamic terror*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
agrasen Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM
To: swamy39@gmail.com

Dear Dr. Swamy,

Namaskar and Jai Hind.

I have read your following article with great interest and the various suggestions and actions you have mentioned therein. While I am a staunch Hindu and a great admirer of you and your efforts to save Hinduism in India, yet I wish to make the following comments regarding the Hindu religion, as to why, in my opinion, we are facing the problems of various invaders, like Islamists and Christians, etc and why I remain quite pessimistic about the future of Hinduism in India:-

1. Hindu religion is a non-violent religion, we must forgive anyone and everyone, even our worst enemy;

2. Our existence on this earth is a mirage and fleeting; we must work for the eternal life for which we have been given the human
birth and therefore we should go through all the suffering which is the result of our past karmas and prarabdh.

3. The Hindu religion makes us, I am sorry to say, cowards as far as fighting the invaders and worldly matters are concerned. We do not want to fight anyone excepting the other Hindus.

4. Hindu history shows that we have never attacked anyone; we have no national feeling as such even though we are very proud of our religion and its teachings; but these teachings are quite ineffective for living in this world honourably in the face of aggressors, etc.

5.We only wait on God, like Shri Ram and Shri Krishna to destroy the evildoers and save the good ones. Ravan would not have been killed if Rama did not come as also Pandavas would have never got their throne if Bhagwan Krishna did not take his avtar.

6. Unfortunately, and with a very heavy heart, to me it appears that Hinduism may decimate from India like Buddhism disappeared from
Afghanistan and Tibet which has been swallowed by China!

7. Islamic menace is for the whole world; but of course Islam wants first to take over India, with the help of the Congress government and the traitor Hindus who are supporting the Government for money and positions and do not care for Hindu religion in which they were born and they became what they are because of the Hindu religion, its teaching and culture. Maybe eventually Islam will face the West - America and Europe which may lead to its downfall.

I would be most grateful for your comments and advice, Thank you.

Best regards,

Sincerely,

AGRASEN


On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:16 PM, wrote:



How to wipe out Islamic terror*


By Subramanian Swamy




*http://expressbuzz.com/edition/print.aspx?artid=177598*
* http://expressbuzz.com/edition/print.aspx?artid=177598





31 May 2010 12:33:00 AM IST*

According to the latest Union home ministry Annual Report to Parliament, of
the 35 states in India, 29 are affected by terrorist acts carried out by all
kinds of forces. Terrorism, I define here as the illegal use of force to
overawe the civilian population to make it do or not do an act against their
will and well-being.


There are about 40 reported and unreported terrorist attacks per month in
the country. That is why the recent US National Counter-Terrorism Centre
publication A Chronology of International Terrorism states: ‘India suffered
more terrorist acts than any other country’.


While the PM thinks that Maoists’ threat is most serious, I think Islamic
terrorism is even more serious. If we did not have today the present Union
home minister, PM, and UPA chairperson, then Maoists can be eliminated in a
month, much as I did with the LTTE in Tamil Nadu, as a senior minister in
1991, or MGR did with the Naxalites in the early 1980s.


Why is Islamic terrorism our number one problem of national security? About
this there will be no doubt after 2012. By that year, I expect a Taliban
takeover in Pakistan and the Americans to flee Afghanistan. Then, Islam will
confront Hinduism to ‘complete unfinished business’.


Let us remember that every Hindu-Muslim riot in India since 1947, has been
ignited by Muslim fanatics — if one goes by all the commissions of inquiry
set up after every riot. By today’s definition these riots are all terrorist
acts. Muslims, though a minority in India, still have fanatics who dare to
lead violent attacks against Hindus. Other Muslims of India just lump it,
sulk or rejoice. That is the history from Babar’s time to Aurangzeb. There
have been exceptions to this apathy of Muslims like Dara Shikoh, in the old
days, or like M J Akbar and Salman Haidar today who are not afraid to speak
out against Islamic terror, but still they remain exceptions.


*Blame the Hindus*
In one sense, I do not blame the Muslim fanatics for targeting Hindus. I
blame us Hindus who have taken their individuality permitted in Sanatana
Dharma to the extreme. Millions of Hindus can assemble without state
patronage for Kumbh Mela completely self-organised, but they all leave for
home oblivious of the targeting of Hindus in Kashmir, Mau, Melvisharam and
Malappuram and do not lift their little finger to help organise Hindus. For
example, if half the Hindus vote together rising above their caste and
language, a genuine Hindu party will have a two-thirds majority in
Parliament and Assemblies.


The secularists now tout instances of Hindu fanatics committing terrorist
attacks against Muslims or other minorities. But these attacks are mostly
state sponsored, often by the Congress itself, and not by Hindu ‘non-state
actors’. Muslim-led attacks are however all by ‘non-state actors’ unless one
includes the ISI and rogue elements in Pakistan’s army which are aiding
them, as state sponsoring.


Fanatic Muslim attacks have been carried out to target and demoralise the
Hindus, to make Hindus yield that which they should not, with the aim of
undermining and ultimately to dismantle the Hindu foundation of India. This
is the unfinished war of 1,000 years which Osama bin Laden talks about. In
fact, the earliest terror tactics in India were deployed in Bengal 1946 by
Suhrawady and Jinnah to terrorise Hindus to give in on the demand for
Pakistan. The Congress party claiming to represent the Hindus capitulated,
and handed 25 per cent of India on a platter to Mohammed Ali Jinnah. Now
they want the remaining 75 per cent.


*Forces against Hindus*
This is not to say that other stooges have not targeted Hindus. During the
last six decades since Independence, British imperialist-inspired Dravidian
movement led by E V Ramaswamy Naicker, in the name of rationalism tried to
debunk as irrational the Hindu religion, and terrorised the Hindu priestly
class, ie, the Brahmins, for propagating the Hindu religion.


The movement’s organisational arm, the Dravida Kazhagam (DK), had venerated
Ravana for 50 years to spite the Hindu adoration of Rama and vulgarise the
abduction of Sita, till the DK belatedly learnt that Ravana was a Brahmin
and a pious bhakta of Lord Shiva too. Abandoning this course of defaming
Ramayana, the DK have now become stooges of the anti-Indian LTTE which has
specialised in killing the Hindu Tamil leadership in Sri Lanka. Of course
the DK has now been orphaned by the decimation of the LTTE.


*Civil war situation*
In the 1960s, the Christian missionaries had inspired the Nagas. The Nagas
also wanted to further amputate Bharat Mata by seeking secession of Nagaland
from the nation. In the 1980s, the Hindus


of Manipur were targeted by foreign-trained elements. Manipuris were told:
give up Hinduism or be killed. In Kashmir, since the beginning of the 1990s,
militants in league with the Pakistan-trained terrorists also targeted the
Hindus by driving the Hindu Pandits out of the Valley, or killing them or
dishonouring their women folk.


Recognising that targeting of Hindus is being widely perceived, and that
Muslims of India are largely just passive spectators, the foreign patrons of
Islamic terrorists are beginning to engage in terrorist acts that could pit
Muslims against Hindus in nation-wide conflagration and possible civil war
as in Serbia and Bosnia. Muslims cannot be divided into ‘moderates’ and
‘extremists’ because the former just capitulate when confronted. Recently,
Pakistan civilian government capitulated on ‘kite flying’ and banned it
because Taliban considers it as ‘Hindu’. Moderate governments of Malaysia
and Kazhakstan are now demolishing Hindu temples.


*Collective response*
Hence, the first lesson to be learnt from recent history, for tackling
terrorism in India is that the Hindu is the target and that Muslims of India
are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus
slide into suicide against Hindus. It is to undermine the Hindu psyche and
create fear of civil war that terror attacks are organised.


And hence since the Hindu is the target, Hindus must collectively respond as
Hindus against the terrorist and not feel individually isolated or worse, be
complacent because he or she is not personally affected. If one Hindu dies
merely because he or she was a Hindu, then a bit of every Hindu also dies.
This is an essential mental attitude, a necessary part of a virat Hindu (for
fuller discussion of the concept of virat Hindu, see my Hindus Under Siege:
The Way Out Haranand, 2006).


Therefore we need today a collective mindset as Hindus to stand against the
Islamic terrorist. In this response, Muslims of India can join us if they
genuinely feel for the Hindu. That they do, I will not believe, unless they
acknowledge with pride that though they may be Muslims, their ancestors are
Hindus.


It is not easy for them to acknowledge this ancestry because the Muslim
mullah and Christian missionary would consider it as unacceptable since that
realisation would dilute the religious fervour in their faith and also
create an option for their possible re-conversion to Hinduism. Hence, these
religious leaders preach hatred and violence against the kafir ie, the Hindu
(for example read Chapter 8 verse 12 of the Quran) to keep the faith of
their followers. The Islamic terrorist outfits, eg the SIMI, has already
resolved that India is Darul Harab, and they are committed to make it Darul
Islam. That makes them free of any moral compunction whatsoever in dealing
with Hindus.


*Brihad Hindu Samaj*
But still, if any Muslim does so acknowledge his or her Hindu legacy, then
we Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj, which
is Hindustan. India that is Bharat that is Hindustan is a nation of Hindus
and others whose ancestors are Hindus. Even Parsis and Jews in India have
Hindu ancestors. Others, who refuse to so acknowledge or those foreigners
who become Indian citizens by registration can remain in India, but should
not have voting rights (which means they cannot be elected
representatives).


Hence, to begin with, any policy to combat terrorism must begin with
requiring each and every Hindu becoming a committed or virat Hindu. To be a
virat Hindu one must have a Hindu mindset, a mindset that recognises that
there is vyaktigat charitra (personal character) and a rashtriya charitra
(national character).


It is not enough if one is pious, honest and educated. That is the personal
character only. National character is a mindset actively and vigorously
committed to the sanctity and integrity of the nation. For example, Manmohan
Singh, our prime minister, has high personal character (vyaktigat charitra),
but by being a rubber stamp of a semi-literate Sonia Gandhi, and waffling on
all national issues, he has proved that he has no rashtriya charitra.


The second lesson for combating the terrorism we face today is: since
demoralising the Hindu and undermining the Hindu foundation of India in
order to destroy the Hindu civilisation, is the goal of all terrorists in
India we must never capitulate and never concede any demand of the
terrorists. The basic policy has to be: never yield to any demand of the
terrorists. That necessary resolve has not been shown in our recent history.
Instead ever since we conceded Pakistan in 1947 under duress, we have been
mostly yielding time and again.


*Bowing to terrorists*
In 1989, to obtain the release of Mufti Mohammed Sayeed’s daughter, Rubaiyya
who had been kidnapped by terrorists, five terrorists in Indian jails were
set free by the V P Singh’s government. This made these criminals in the
eyes of Kashmiri separatists and fence sitters heroes, as those who had
brought India’s Hindu establishment on its knees. To save Rubaiyya it was
not necessary to surrender to terrorist demands.


The worst capitulation to terrorists in our modern history was in the Indian
Airlines IC-814 hijack in December 1999 staged in Kandahar. The government
released three terrorists even without getting court permission (required
since they were in judicial custody). Moreover, they were escorted by a
senior minister on the PM’s special Boeing all the way to Kandahar as royal
guests instead of being shoved across the Indo-Pakistan border.


Worse still, all the three after being freed, went back to Pakistan and
created three separate terrorist organisations to kill Hindus. Mohammed
Azhar, whom the National Security Advisor Brijesh Mishra had then described
as “a mere harmless cleric”, upon his release led the LeT to savage and
repeated terrorist attacks on Hindus all over India from Bangalore to
Srinagar. Since mid-2000, Azhar is responsible for the killing of over 2,000
Hindus and the attack on Parliament on December 13, 2001. Omar Sheikh who
helped al-Qaeda is in jail in US custody for killing US journalist Daniel
Pearl, while the third, Zargar is engaged today in random killings of Hindus
in Doda and Jammu after founding Al-Mujahideen Jingaan.


This Kandahar episode proves that we should never negotiate with terrorists,
never yield. If you do, then sooner or later you will end up losing more
lives than you will ever save by a deal with terrorists.


*Moment of truth*
The third lesson to be learnt is that whatever and however small the
terrorist incident, the nation must retaliate—not by measured and ‘sober’
responses but by massive retaliation. Otherwise what is the alternative?
Walk meekly to death expecting that our ‘sober’ responses will be rewarded
by our neighbours and their patrons? We will be back to 1100 AD fooled into
suicidal credulity. We should not be ghouls for punishment from terrorists
and their patrons. We should retaliate.


For example, when Ayodhya temple was sought to be attacked, this was not a
big terrorist incident but we should have massively retaliated by
re-building the Ram temple at the site.


This is Kaliyug, and hence there is no room for sattvic responses to evil
people. Hindu religion has a concept of apat dharma and we should invoke it.
This is the moment of truth for us. Either we organise to survive as a
civilisation or vanish as the Persian, Babylonian, and Egyptian
civilisations did centuries ago before the brutal Islamic onslaught. For
that our motto should be Saam, Dhaam, Bheda, Danda.


*Poverty is no factor*
What motivates the Islamic terrorists in India? Many are advising us Hindus
to deal with the root ‘cause’ of terrorism rather than concentrate on
eradicating terrorists by retaliation. And pray what is the root ‘cause’?


According to bleeding heart liberals, terrorists are born or bred because of
illiteracy, poverty, oppression, and discrimination. They argue that instead
of eliminating them, the root cause of these four disabilities in society
should be removed. Only then terrorism will disappear. Before replying to
this, let us understand that I have serious doubts about the integrity of
these liberals, or more appropriately, these promiscuous intellectuals. They
seek to deaden the emotive power of the individual and render him passive
(inculcate ‘majboori’ in our psyche). A nation state cannot survive for long
with such a capitulationist mentality.


It is rubbish to say that terrorists who mastermind the attacks are poor.
Osama bin laden for example is a billionaire. Islamic terrorists are
patronised by those states that have grown rich from oil revenues. In
Britain, the terrorists arrested so far for the bombings are all well-to-do
persons. Nor are terrorists uneducated. Most of terrorist leaders are
doctors, chartered accountants, MBAs and teachers. For example, in the
failed Times Square New York episode, the Islamic terrorist Shahzad studied
and got an MBA from a reputed US university. He was from a highly placed
family in Pakistan. He certainly faced no discrimination and oppression in
his own country. The gang of nine persons who hijacked four planes on
September 11, 2001 and flew them into the World Trade Towers in New York and
other targets were certainly not discriminated or oppressed in the United
States. Hence it is utter rubbish to say that terror is the outcome of the
poverty terrorists face.
If we accept the Left-wing liberals argument, does it mean that in Islamic
countries, the non-Islamic religious minority who are discriminated and
oppressed can take to terrorism? In the Valley, where Muslims are in
majority, not only Article 370 of the Constitution provides privileges to
the majority but it is the minority Hindus who have been slaughtered, or
raped, and dispossessed. They have become refugees in squalid conditions in
their own country.


It is also a ridiculous idea that terrorists cannot be deterred because they
are irrational, willing to die, and have no ‘return address’. Terrorist
masterminds have political goals and a method in their madness. An effective
strategy to deter terrorism is therefore to defeat those political goals and
to rubbish them by counter-terrorist action. How is that strategy to be
structured? In a brilliant research paper published by Robert Trager and
Dessislava Zagorcheva this year (‘Deterring Terrorism’ International
Security, vol 30, No 3, Winter 2005/06, pp 87-123) has provided the general
principles to structure such a strategy.


*Goal-strategy*
Applying these principles, I advocate the following strategy to negate the
political goals of Islamic terrorism in India, provided the Muslim
community fail to condemn these goals and call them un-Islamic:

Goal 1: Overawe India on Kashmir.


Strategy: Remove Article 370, and re-settle ex-servicemen in the Valley.
Create Panun Kashmir for Hindu Pandit community. Look or create opportunity
to take over PoK. If Pakistan continues to back terrorists, assist the
Baluchis and Sindhis to struggle for independence.


Goal 2: Blast our temples and kill Hindu devotees.


Strategy: Remove the masjid in Kashi Vishwanath temple complex, and 300
others in other sites as a tit-for-tat.


Goal 3: Make India into Darul Islam.


Strategy: Implement Uniform Civil Code, make Sanskrit learning compulsory
and singing of Vande Mataram mandatory, and declare India as Hindu Rashtra
in which only those non-Hindus can vote if they proudly acknowledge that
their ancestors are Hindus. Re-name India as Hindustan as a nation of Hindus
and those whose ancestors are Hindus.


Goal 4: Change India’s demography by illegal immigration, conversion, and
refusal to adopt family planning.


Strategy: Enact a national law prohibiting conversion from Hindu religion to
any other religion. Re-conversion will not be banned. Declare caste is not
birth-based but code of discipline based. Welcome non-Hindus to re-convert
to the caste of their choice provided they adhere to the code of discipline.
Annex land from Bangladesh in proportion to the illegal migrants from that
country staying in India. At present, northern one-third from Sylhet to
Khulna can be annexed to re-settle the illegal migrants.


Goal 5: Denigrate Hinduism through vulgar writings and preaching in mosques,
madrassas, and churches to create loss of self-respect amongst Hindus and
make them fit for capitulation.


Strategy: Propagate the development of a Hindu mindset (see my new book
Hindutva and National Renaissance, Haranand, 2010).

India can solve its terrorist problem within five years by such a deterrent
strategy, but for that we have to learn the four lessons outlined above, and
have a Hindu mindset to take bold, risky, and hard decisions to defend the
nation. If the Jews can be transformed from lambs walking meekly to the gas
chambers to fiery lions in just 10 years, it is not difficult for Hindus in
much better circumstances (after all we are 83 per cent of India), to do so
in five years.


Guru Gobind Singh has shown us the way already, how just five fearless
persons under spiritual guidance can transform a society. Even if half the
Hindu voters are persuaded to collectively vote as Hindus, and for a party
sincerely committed to a Hindu agenda, then we can forge an instrument for
change. And that ultimately is the bottom line in the strategy to deter
terrorism in a democratic Hindustan at this moment of truth.


*About the author:
Subramanian Swamy* *is a former Union minister*



__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
One strong Hindu can change the thought-current of the whole world...
Hindus should have fearlessness,the first prerequisite of a spiritual life.

To Post a message, send it to: prohindu@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: prohindu-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
MARKETPLACE
Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use.


__,_._,___



--
SHER SINGH AGRAWAL
Please see my blog at
http://agrasen.blogspot.com/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------