Tuesday, December 16, 2008




Vijay Ashar Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:23 PM
Reply-To: bhakta711@yahoo.com
To: proudHindu@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "Prof. Bharat Gajjar" , agrasen@gmail.com, prgsatish@yahoo.com
Namaste, Kuru. I enjoy reading your comments and personal observations because of their patriotic fervor. I can even find sympathy with many of your assessments and inferences about the detrimental impact on the nation's fortunes because of Nehru and Indira's slanted leadership. But do you have any documentary evidence that Nehru's policy in Kashmir was shaped by his obsessive fear of being killed by a nationalistic 'man in uniform' begrudging the loss of five provinces at the time of Partition, and that Indira Gandhi specifically turned down a plea by Mujibur Rahman that the freed East Pakistani province be allowed to join with India? If a convincing evidence exists to warrant such a conclusion, then it should be widely publicized before the next elections to be held by April. It is sure to turn away many patriotic Indians from voting for Congress and its allies.

--- On Mon, 12/15/08, Rashtra1947@aol.com wrote:

From: Rashtra1947@aol.com
Subject: [proudHindu] WHY KASHMIR WAS INVADED.
To: proudHindu@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 15, 2008, 3:26 PM


The terrorists came to Mumbai last month (26-29 November 2008) due to India's own rulers, who, if uncovered, are the nefarious nexus of "ITALY & ISLAM" with the subservient timid brainwashed HINDU "CAMP FOLLOWERS" doing their Master's bidding.

Lashkar-e-Taiba is a Kashmiri outfit. Kashmiris are angry and want to get out of Partitioned Indian Secular State. But HOW AND WHY DID KASHMIR BECOME AN OBJECT OF ETERNAL DISPUTE between India and Pakistan? Do we know of anyone asking this question?

Here is the reason which the media in any other country on earth, except our “subjugated” Bharat, would have loved to explore:


High Treason is of two kinds: One, where a junior rank or an ordinary person betrays the location of a military unit to the enemy and has it wiped out; the other, of strategic nature like Partition of India in 1947 when five provinces were surrendered unconditionally to the enemy- to hold in perpetuity.

But whatever the kind of High Treason the traitor lives in deadly fear for his life and is, therefore, at extreme pains to hide his crime. He will leave no stone unturned in marginalising and demoralising, even destroying, the elements that pose a threat to him. India’s Jawaharlal Nehru was no different. The elements as seen by him that would assassinate him for High Treason of such unimaginable magnitude were-

1. The HINDUS and SIKHS. They were clearly betrayed when vast territories of Hindustan were surrendered unconditionally to indigenous Muslims. The Sikhs were completely wiped out in West Punjab where many historic shrines and gurdwaras, including the birthplace of Guru Nanak Dev, the place of martyrdom of Guru Arjun Dev, were located.

2. The Armed Forces. This is a body of patriotic men, highly trained and motivated to defend every inch of territory. How would they react knowing the unconditional surrender of five provinces? Nehru had no doubt that the assassin would be a man in uniform.

Nehru, being a barrister, was very clever as well as cunning. He not only escaped being lynched or shot dead but, on the contrary, was hailed by the mass media as the architect of modern India and the best politician that Hindustan EVER produced. An essential part of his strategy to save his skin was deliberate “Hindu bashing” and the neglect of India’s armed forces.

Let us examine the act of treason that smashed India's Integrity and wiped out her cherished Secularism in five provinces overnight without a single traitor being caught.

Why was Nehru not unmasked and dealt with by the nation? Because the nation was still impoverished and coming to terms with Partition. The official propaganda blasts put the entire limelight on Nehru and his “glow of freedom.”

People of India called her “Mother” India and regarded her more sacred than their own mothers. They would have confronted the enemy who demanded even an inch of her territory. Nehru had signed the unconditional surrender of India without demanding referendum or insisting on transfer of population. He had no mandate to do so. That is why he feared for his life when the gravity of that treachery & treason came to haunt him day and night.

Who would be out to assassinate him? He knew that the Muslims applauded him for rewarding them so richly and Christians rulers were “party to partition”. But the Hindus were really upset and angry. He had reduced Bharat territorially, played joke with their Secularism and, worst of all, humiliated them before the whole world as a defeated and cowardly nation.


Leaning heavily on MK Gandhi’s anesthetic chants of “Hindu Muslim Bhai Bhai”, he devised the idea of GETTING KASHMIR INVADED in order to lock the nation's full attention to THAT State while completely forgetting the fate of FIVE others. Thus the invasion of Kashmir took place within days of Partition in accordance with Nehru’s desperate desire to save his own skin.

That is why he did not put an end to that aggression within days when the Indian troops were advancing rapidly. He took the case to UNO where, to his great satisfaction, it stalled for YEARS, if not for DECADES, taking everyone’s eyes off Nehru’s own treachery.

Assassination of “Mahatma”(?) Gandhi gave him the perfect excuse to invent the phrase “Dangerous Hindu” in order to go after Hindu nationalism. At the same time he moved closer to the Muslims and the Christians within India.

Hindu bashing is still going on and one can write a book on all the ingenious and not so subtle ways in which the Hindus are being isolated, neglected, degraded, divided and bypassed in order to demoralise and weaken them. India betrayed the Indians in Uganda and Fiji and went out of her way to kill the Tamils in Sri Lanka and bring about the demise of the only Hindu Kingdom on earth in Nepal. There are Hajj subsidies for the Muslims but nothing like this for the Hindus. “Brahmin bashing” is now State policy in India. Hindus are often absent from the top posts, e.g. governors and ambassadors, even presidents (supreme commanders).


We now understand why Nehru feared none more than his own armed forces. He had held them back from performing their primary duty of defence of territory. He was convinced that his assassin will be a man in uniform with sworn loyalty to territory. This fear remained his phobia till his death and soon permeated throughout the entire ruling establishment and the politics of India.

His actions and omissions betrayed his strong inner wish to humiliate the armed forces through inaction (Uganda & Fiji), “cease fires” (Kashmir and Sri Lanka), relegation of status vis a vis civilian grades and by nepotism for promotion to senior ranks. Though MK Gandhi's "Ahimsa Parmo Dharma" became a liability after India became a sovereign state, Nehru continued with the deception assiduously, elevating Gandhi to the status of "Father of Nation". This was a devastating blow to Hindu manhood.

Will to fight of the Hindus was completely destroyed. To most the armed forces seemed irrelevant. School books had lengthy chapters on pacifist Gandhi, neutrality and disarmament. Smart Nehru never mentioned past victories, especially by Hindu and Sikh warriors.

Nehru drastically reduced the pay and status of the armed forces overnight, denied them glory and thrill of victories in battlefield, did not encourage the nation to pay homage to their valour in battlefield, deliberately hurt their pride at every step, reduced their battle worthiness by keeping them understaffed, undermanned and very poorly equipped.


One never realised that the Chinese were “invited” by none else but Jawaharlal Nehru to inflict a crushing defeat on his army in 1962. The well timed chants of “Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai”, that preceded the invasion, were the equivalent of psychological anaesthesia to confuse and demoralise the armed forces. There was strong psychological obstacle: “Is one supposed to kill “brothers?” Traitor Nehru was no inspiring Divine Sri Krishna in the battlefield of Kurukshetra!

Nehru Dynasty continued that “army bashing” culture and sent them to fight the Tamils in Sri Lanka only to receive a “bloody nose” and “cease fire” as in Kashmir.

Considering the armed forces merely “cannon fodder or a relic of the British colonial past, none of the so-called Gandhis, who hold the fate of India in their hands, donned uniform or expressed any interest in joining the army. In contrast we see all the members of the British Royal family wearing uniform with pride, providing inspiration to the armed forces and the nation.

Nehru died in glory, passing on the autocratic rule to his daughter Indira who loved the flattery in the phrase, "INDIRA IS INDIA", coined by world's most slavish media who had no time and interest to expose her as a Muslim (Mrs. Khan) and an enemy of the Hindus.

Consider this: Even today the brainwashed HINDU nation has no interest whatsoever in discovering the core loyalty of the Italian-born Sonia Maino who is called “Rashtramata” (Mother of Nation) and given front seat in the Indian Parliament.

No wonder then that to this day the ignorant Indians (MP’s, MLA’s, Governors, ministers, scholars, priests and soldiers, all included) are more locked on to the Kashmir dispute than concerned over the unconditional surrender of Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar, Quetta and Dhaka, for which not only the Congress Party had to be disbanded, even put behind bars promptly, but also the KORAN banned and the TRANSFER OF POPULATION accomplished immediately.

Nehru let go of five provinces of India without showing the slightest unease. That is why he feared his own assassination by the patriotic armed forces!

Nehru Dynasty, that still holds Partitioned India in their tight grip, is the extension of his Will & Legacy. They are stuck to the original High Treason that also trapped Kashmir in the cycle of permanent death and destruction, turning this tourists’ paradise into terrorists haven.

Nehru had thrown a gauntlet to the Indian Muslims after rewarding them amply with vast territory, “I will give you Lahore & Dhaka but NOT Srinagar!”

Article 370 of Constitution, granting special favours and concessions to the Kashmiris, was meant to soften the blow on them for being “forced” to stay in Bharat. That is why no other State was granted such lavish subsidies and grants. Nehru’s sway on all the chief ministers was so awesome that no other State in India dared to question the special status of Kashmir or demand the same subsidies and concessions for their own subjects as given to the Kashmiris.

Nehru turned the armed forces into a mercenary force to fight and die in Kashmir but with no right to live or buy land in that state while a Kashmiri can live and own immovable property anywhere in India.

Indian armed forces are now praying for improvement in their long neglected pay scales without realizing the reason for the foot dragging baboos’ unwillingness to go against the iron-cast Will of Nehru.


Indians overlooked another betrayal with the ease of breathing and forgave the culprit. It was the return of our own captured territory, East Bengal, to Islam in 1972. Many brave soldiers lost their lives in that war for the sake of India and Secularism, not for Islam.

Indira, true to her father’s pro Islamic anti Hindu Ideology, did not commend Secularism to Shaikh Mujiburrahman, the Bengali leader.

Indira was a secret convert to Islam at the time of marrying Feroze KHAN of Allahabad in 1942 who became “Gandhi” for political expediency. As a Muslim she could not lift a finger to bring any gain to secular India, leave aside bringing back captured East Bengal to Hindustan.

After the Indian army smashed East Pakistani resistance, Mujiburrahman was keen to unite Bengal by joining India. He was a liberal Musalman and a true Son of Bengal.

Indira was shocked at the very idea and advised him to accept sovereignty, saying, “A separate Islamic State will act as the formidable barrier between Hindu India and Buddhist Burma. Furthermore, you will go unscathed in the event of another Indo-Pak war.” After that she spent 12 years, planning the bloody blow to the Sikhs in June 1984,

She was true to her father’s Islamic roots and loyalties, but was adored and admired by the ignorant Hindus who, even today, see none more suitable to lead and guide Hindustan than Sonia, the Catholic “White Elephant” from Italy. Waiting in the wings to continue this strategic doom of Hindus in Bharat is Rahul “Gandhi” with future spouse waiting in Catholic Colombia. She is likely to join him when he assumes the office of Prime Minister. Then she, too, will have a say in the conduct of any military operations by India. Today’s Supreme Commander of India, too, is no Maharani of Jhansi.

It is in this direction that we see the native Indian (Hindu) leaders’ UNFINISHED task.


15 Dec 2008.__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Calendar

From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Finance
It's Now Personal
Guides, news,
advice & more.
Y! Messenger
Want a quick chat?
Chat over IM with
group members.
Group Charity
Identifying the
best non-profits.




Post a Comment

<< Home