Wednesday, January 27, 2010




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:11 AM

The British gave India back to their own stooges, the ideal duo to destroy India “by Constitution” having conquered her by “Sword & Gun” earlier. One was the “servant of islam” (Gandhi), the other a sworn ENEMY of Hindus and at the same time a great admirer of foreigners (Nehru).

Barrister Nehru, in particular, knew that to destroy the Hindus he had to reduce their TERRITORY and NUMBERS and destroy their UNITY and MORALE (SPIRIT). He would show his contempt of everything Hindu. He would deny them recognition in public and any mention in Constitution. He would avoid their company in public, ridicule them, never smile at them, never consult them on any State matter, never appreciate their genius and achievements but give key posts to Muslims and Christians. He would take Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Edwina Mountbatten for his constant companions while his propaganda machines described him as a patriot and a great freedom fighter.

In the event when the British left it was Nehru who cried the most, begging of the Viceroy to stay on in office as Governor General. He gave a ceremonial send off at Mumbai docks to the last British military unit leaving India. At the same time he called the Jawans of Indian National Army (INA) traitors and dismissed them all in disgrace! Any fool could see Nehru’s love of India and our Jawans.

Nehru’s Constitution neglected none more than the brave armed forces of the country who were seen as a symbol of aggression meant to be disbanded in disgrace under Gandhi’s ethos of “Ahimsa Parmo Dharma” after Nehru assumed the role of moral master of the world. Unconditional surrender of Lahore and withdrawal from East Bengal were their worst HUMILIATION and the lowest point of their self esteem, pride and honour. The only victory worth celebrating by them was turned into shame & disappointment when East Bengal was returned to the ENEMY after its capture by our Jawans. The army is still smarting under their previous humiliation through “cease fires” and inconclusive wars.

Nehru’s Constitution was meant to push the Hindus to back row, ensuring only bad news for them. For this he gave the Muslims free hand to massacre the Hindus, starting with Noakhali, later West Punjab and finally the complete extermination of Hindus in North Kashmir. One never saw Nehru sad even for a second over the rape and abduction of tens of thousands of Hindu girls whom we regard “devis”.

It was, in deed, the extension of the British colonial policy of suppressing the Hindus in order to continuously demoralise them, Hindu temples, being Nehru’s special target, never got any protection as per Constitution. Nehru’s Constitution was utterly useless with regard to large scale conversions of Hindus to foreign religions since Partition, that itself was his deliberate State policy. Thus the Hindus have always been getting bad news starting with the surrender of territory on historic scale.

Broken and bleeding India began with her DEFEAT at Partition after which the country emerged in greatly reduced borders. Did anyone see Nehru show remorse or regret? In fact the clever FOREIGN AGENT NEHRU turned the worst ever historic defeat and surrender into India's “Independence”!

Operation “Blue Star” (attack on Harimandir Sahib) in Amritsar in June 1984 was the extension of Nehru’s policy of weakening the Hindus by destroying the Sikhs. Indira’s propaganda machine described it as her patriotic act but never mentioned her HIGH TREASON when she returned East Bengal to the enemy after its capture or when she schemed against the Tamils (of INDIAN origin) in Sri Lanka who desperately needed “Mother India” for help.

Diaspora in the eyes of Nehru was extension of Hindu India and, therefore, to be IGNORED or treated with contempt. His Constitution does not recognise them or extend protection to them in any way. Hindus are as vulnerable in South Kashmir as in Malaysia.

The litmus test of this Constitution are two words, “KHANS” and “SONIA”. The former reign supreme in Bollywood and the latter reigns supreme in India's PARLIAMENT.

For the Hindus, both men and women, it is the Constitution “of the enemy, by the enemy and FOR THE ENEMY.” It does not lay down strictly, “No conversion of Hindus!“ and “No conversion of Hindu girls at marriage!”

Indians still laugh & celebrate on January 26th and August 15th every year but not weep & cry.



The Constitution of India has demoralised the nation to the extent that the COMBINED “public opinion” of ONE BILLION can neither “show the door” to the Italian-born symbol of European Reoccupation (Indian version of Columbus) or try RAJIV, the BOFORS CHOR, in any court of Law.

Because of this treacherous Constitution the HINDUS today are in more precarious situation in South Asia than before the Constitution was enacted in January 1950.

Background knowledge of

-Hindu DISUNITY due to centuries of slavery,

-Devastatingly destructive role of Islam and Christianity in ENSLAVED India,

-Hindus’ suicidal inability to provide strong, resolute and inspiring LEADERSHIP in order to lead them to victory in fight for “Akhand Bharat”, and to ensure the honour and dignity of native womanhood (Italian born Sonia Maino) and manhood (the Khans of Bollywood).

-The “I am all right, Jack” mentality of the Hindus. It means universal apathy and detachment towards the suffering fellow Hindus. When West Punjab and East Bengal were being ethnically cleansed in violence and bloodshed not one Muslim was “touched” in U.P. and Maharashtra or thrown out of Kerala and Tamil Nadu. On the contrary, we see Mujahideen from as far afield as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Somalia and even Chechnya, fighting along side the local terrorists in South Kashmir. British born Muslims have gone to Afghanistan to kill the British soldiers. Hindus in Bharat did not teach the Muslims a lesson when South Kashmir was ethnically cleansed in 1989.

-The nature of “HINDU BASHING” ruling political party,

-The perpetual rule of ONE anti national and corrupt Dynasty.

is an essential pre-requisite to understand this Comment.

The Indian RULING ESTABLISHMENT will "celebrate" Bharat’s (Middle India’s) REPUBLIC DAY on 26th. January. On this date in 1950 her new Constitution was enacted. Let us expose the COWARDICE and TREACHERY of its writers.

What we call “India” or “Bharat” is in reality MIDDLE INDIA. The Constitution ought to have stated Pakistan and Bangladesh as Western India and Eastern India respectively. The Constitution of West Germany did not accept the division of the country in order to acknowledge the existence of East Germany.

The last civil war in India (1947) was FOUGHT between the Muslims (aggressors) and “The Rest.” (defenders). The next war too will be fought between “The Rest” and the Muslims.

Last time the Muslims had full support of the Christians (the British). The next time, too, the Muslims will have the full support of the Christians (Italians). What guidance does one get from the Constitution of India with this regard? Constitution is supposed to be the eyes and ears of a blind nation.

The first tragic thing about the Constitution is that it “stinks” of anti Hindu bias. And it further “stinks” of TREASON by not mentioning “Akhand Bharat” to which the whole nation, not only Mr. MK Gandhi & Bandit JL Nehru, were supposedly committed till the “last drop of blood in their bodies”. Therefore, as per Constitution the blood in India is water that can be coloured green in Lahore but left pale yellow in Delhi.

The “Vidhan” does not mention the five provinces that were meant to be integral part of AKHAND BHARAT. They had been surrendered unconditionally- without referendum, reason, challenge or FIGHT to the indigenous Muslims two and a half years earlier. The Muslims of India had the “royal” privilege to move over to the newly created ISLAMIC countries, or stay put back in India to enjoy full citizenship rights as per Constitution.

No Indian citizenship can buy any property in South Kashmir as per Constitution. (Article 370).

Two million Indians were massacred and 15 million forcibly expelled from their ancestral homes. Such an unprecedented large scale exodus had never before taken place in India's entire history. But it finds no mention in Constitution showing that the top leaders Gandhi and Nehru regarded the PEOPLE OF INDIA as Hitler regarded the Jews.

There is no mention of a Memorial to the Holocaust of 1947. The Constitution does not refer to the slavery of KARACHI and DHAKA while declaring DELHI independent. The by-products of this Constitution are THREE flags (Pakistan, Bharat and Bangladesh) flying in the capital of India where a yielding conceding appeasing, gentle and uninspiring Shrimati occupies Rashtrapati Bhawan as the Supreme Commander and President.

There had been countless Muslim invasions and continuous occupation of DELHI since 1192 AD but never were vast areas (one third of India) evacuated by the HINDUS as in 1947 due to historic collapse by barristers NEHRU & GANDHI.

The Constitution reflects the most humiliating defeat and surrender of SECULARISM while the leaders claimed to be staunchly committed to secularism. Obviously, the Constitution regards secularism mandatory only for the Hindus and the Sikhs but NOT for the Muslims. The Sikh who shouts, “Secularism to be acceptable in Amritsar has to be RAMMED DOWN THEIR THROATS in Lahore,” runs the risk of being put behind bars for life.

Here are the main flaws in this Constitution-

1. No mention of the unconditional surrender of Secularism, Do countries abandon their fundamental commitments so quickly like this?

2. Unconditional surrender of vast TERRITORIES. What is the meaning of patriotism then?

3. Not defining the Muslims as traitors or separatists at the same moment when Bandit NEHRU saw the “glow of his own freedom”. At the outbreak of World War 2 all the German and Japanese citizens in America and England were interned and not released till the end of war. In India the Constitution declared them to be as patriotic as the loyal Hindus. This was the ugliest joke on all the people of Bharat.

4. While LAHORE is outside the ambit of this Constitution SRINAGAR is not. The result? Total loss of tourism and Hindu life and property in extreme peril.

5. Obvious bias against the majority community (the HINDUS) but at the same time showing excessive concern for the well-being and advancement of the MUSLIMS, e.g. Hajj subsidies and reservation of jobs.

6. The State of Jammu & Kashmir was conceded special and separate identity vide Article 370. Nehru desperately needed the violence and unrest there to take the nation’s mind OFF his own treason at partition. That is why he ordered our advancing troops to stop dead, and not move on, to recover North Kashmir fully.

7. While India is the fountainhead of true RELIGIONS on earth, something that was to be celebrated with great joy and pride, the Constitution does not reflect this at all but treats native and FOREIGN religions at par. In Ayodhya the Mohammed of Arabia is put above Sri Rama of BHARAT. A Constitution that does not defend and lift the image of the country's OWN divine genius is not worth the paper it is written on. For betraying India’s own divine beings, her constitution is a document of national shame. “Gaurav” will remain a mere word, not a reality.

None of the native Avataras, Rishis and Gurus is mentioned even once in this Constitution. It ought to have begun with a Shloka in Sanskrit from Bhagwat Gita.

8. This Constitution gives no direction to ensure that the SUPREME COMMANDER of MIDDLE INDIA must be a COMMITTED HINDU. A wrong person, a devious Muslim or Christian can easily occupy this post and ensure the destruction and defeat of the Indian Army. This Constitution plays with the very security & survival of the Republic.

9. The Constitution adopted the same flag for the country that belonged to All-India Congress Party with one change. Instead of "charkha (spinning wheel) MIDDLE INDIA was to have ASHOKA CHAKRA on its flag. This was a concession to Dr Ambedkar, a Buddhist, whose disdain of Hindu religion was similar to that of JL Nehru.

10. Against popular demand for “VANDE MATRAM” as the national anthem the Constituent Assembly chose “JANA GANA MANA” at the behest of Jenab JL Nehru, half Muslim himself.

11. What direction, impulse or guideline does this Constitution provide to the State to ensure the safety of the people of INDIAN origin living abroad, e.g., UGANDA, FIJI, BANGLADESH, PAKISTAN, KASHMIR, NEPAL, SRI LANKA, MALAYSIA and AUSTRALIA? Its outlook on the EXPATRIATE Indians is that of a flock of sheep who passively watch the wolf carrying off one of them for his meal. In several countries DUAL NATIONALITY is granted automatically as per Constitution in order to facilitate initiative and travel but NOT in India.

Having said all this, one can ask, “What should have been a proper Constitution for MIDDLE INDIA?"

What was a genuinely patriotic HINDU Prime Minister of the newly independent BHARAT expected to do?

1. Declare Middle India as HINDU RASHTRA if separatist breakaway countries on EITHER SIDE had to be ISLAMIC. The world sees clear identity of Pakistan as an Islamic State while India lives on under mongrel Ideology and expected to remain an unstable country where everyone would fight for own rights and privileges. Clearly, Secularism to be decent in DELHI had to be rammed down their throats in LAHORE.

2. The Constitution had to designate the MUSLIMS as “persona non grata” or "guest workers" like the TURKS in Germany.

3. The Constitution had to spell out clearly that only a COMMITTED & PRACTISING HINDU could become the Supreme Commander and the Prime Minister, as also the Governors of the States.

4. A new FLAG had to be designed with NO resemblance with the flag of any political party.

5. “Vande Matram” had to be the national anthem of Bharat.

6. THE Truncated province of Punjab had to be given a new name to match REALITY. The new name could be DOAB (Land of Two Rivers) or simply EAST PUNJAB that rhymes with WEST BENGAL.

7. The Constitution had to stipulate the final date for the closure of all the seditious MUSLIM universities like Aligarh and Deoband, and sanction the establishment of HINDU universities, at least one per State.

8. The aspiration to unify the country had to be clearly stated. In the Constitution of West Germany this was stated in Article 1. The patriotic Germans did NOT accept two Germanys. Thus any East German escaping to the West was automatically given the German citizenship and rehabilitated. Such patriotism and genius was totally lacking in those “mental dwarfs / former slaves” who framed the Constitution of Partitioned Indian Secular State.

9. The status of the MAJORITY community, the HINDUS, remained as low “as per Constitution” as it was during the British Raj when the Christians used to ally themselves with the MUSLIMS- both being foreigners, against the NATIVE Hindus. Partition itself was the proof of that core “unity of purpose” of the foreigners and their animosity towards the Hindus.

A Constitution is like the rudder of a ship, small yet powerful enough to keep the ship on course. The ship called “BHARAT” has a hull that is leaking on every side. It is sailing on an erroneous course. There is no provision in Constitution for ejecting the corrupt captain and crew like body waste. Scoundrels in top families, like Rajiv Gandhi, can get away with importing brides from abroad, thus degrading native womanhood. There is also no provision to try and punish goons like BOFORS CHOR and confiscate their ill-gotten wealth.

The Constitution of India engenders NO loyalty to the country or its TERRITORY. It proved useless when Indira Gandhi returned our own territory (East Bengal) back to the ENEMY after its capture in 1972. There was NOTHING in Constitution to stop her from doing so. She could not be tried for HIGH TREASON and executed or hanged to death for that crime. In sharp contrast we see the Constitutions of Pakistan and Bangladesh that prohibit the return of territory to India under any circumstances.

This “Vidhan” of Bandit Jawaharlal NEHRU does not specify whether the country's identity is HINDU or MONGREL. In contrast the United Kingdom is a CHRISTIAN country with her own State religion (Church of England). The Constitution does not commend ONE LAW FOR ALL. In some parts of Bharat the Muslims have their own Sharia Law.

The Constitution does not defend the rights and dignity of girls being seduced, married and CONVERTED. There is NO assurance to the nation that its Secularism will be guaranteed if the Muslims OUTNUMBER the Hindus due to disproportionate increase in their numbers. It has NO provision to ensure that the foreigners do not convert the natives with incentives and rewards.

The Hindu “LION” was put in the cage called “VIDHAN” and continuously starved. Weak and emaciated, and lacking self confidence and self esteem, it says to one Abdul Kalam, “Sir, be our supreme commander and you do not have to be a Hindu,” and to one Sonia Maino, “Madam, become our prime minister and we will also have your son rule us for ever. He may, if he so desires, bring his bride from Venezuela, Malaysia or Columbia.” Where on earth do we see such despicable COLLAPSE of the whole nation?

The pathetic plight of the Hindus from Kashmir to Kerala is the proof that the quality of the Constitution that was inflicted on MIDDLE INDIA was (and still remains) pathetic.

The Constitution of the UNITED States of America has such vigorous and dynamic impulses going out that the attack of Nine Eleven resulted in the destruction of the Government of Taliban in Afghanistan. The Constitution of Middle India lacks vitality to the extent that despite the claims the Indian army has not been able to advance even one centimetre across the “cease fire line”.

The WORST thing about this Constitution is that it regards India's existence from MIDNIGHT 14/15 August 1947 with full compliments to the cowards who agreed to the surrender of India. Had Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose been alive no one would have dared to cut, chop and fragment India in this vulgar manner or invaded Kashmir. Regrettably, there is little mention of the great Hindu Kings and the indigenous civilisation of the past.

Let the nation judge for itself and then scrap this Document of TREACHERY, and write up a new one to recognise the GENIUS and POTENTIAL of Hindu nation or even to match the vigour and dynamic of the Constitution of the United States of America. The era of “Indian Coolie” is LONG PAST.



26 January 2010


Reply to sender | Reply to group
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity: New Members 16 New Photos 1
Visit Your Group Start a New Topic
For yuva udgosh newsletter send your address,phone-no & email address
Please Share Your Thoughts,Activities,Social welfair activities,Vedic Sidhants, National Integration & your valueable views on Arya Youth group or email at or
The Arya Youth Group is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the Arya Yuvak Parishad views or opinions. Please note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the sender have been verified.

The opinion express in the group is of the author & not neccessary reflect the opinion of group owner.
contact Anil Arya(National President)-09810117464,09868051444
Mahender Bhai(National Secretary)-01120012237,9868246754
D.K. Bhagat(Press Co-ordinator)09312406810,1120298026,
Shanker Dev(AryaSamaj Kabir Basti Office Manager)-09868002130
Office time-12am to 7.00 pm weekly off-Thursday
Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use.